The LINGUIST List is dedicated to providing information on language and language analysis, and to providing the discipline of linguistics with the infrastructure necessary to function in the digital world. LINGUIST is a free resource, run by linguistics students and faculty, and supported by your donations. Please support LINGUIST List during the 2017 Fund Drive.
Ask-A-Linguist Message Details
|Subject:||Semantics or pragmatics?|
|Question:||Hello, I was wondering which area of linguistics deals with perceived vs. intended meaning of a word. For example, if I say the word ''socialism'', it has certain connotations for me, but my listener might have very different connotations. Would that be semantics or pragmatics? Thank you, Jessi|
|Reply:||This is a bit fuzzy for a few reasons. Semantics generally refers to literal meaning, and pragmatics to meanings beyond the literal. However, you could have a legitimate argument on what the definition of "socialism" entails, so that is semantics (and yet mixed with pragmatics if someone uses the term to imply other concepts beyond socialism). A less political example might be a term like "cynic" which in general discourse means someone jaded or unoptimistic. A scholar of the Greek philosopy might use it to refer to a practitioner of the original Cynic philosophy. I think some more specific terms that might help would be * frames or frames of reference - how someone metaphorically views the world. Lakoff was a notable proponent of this concept as it relates to political discourse, but it's not without controversy. * genres/discourse styles/jargon - how groups/communities communicate with each other. Drs may communicate one with with patients and another with a colleague. Studies of political discourse do show that people of opposing points of view tend to form distinct discourses (jargons/styles/pragmatics). In many ways, different political parties can be analyzed as slightly different cultures. You would also have to consider how a piece of text/speech was meant to be used. Often, the purpose is to "motivate the base", but not always. Hope this helps|
|Reply From:||Elizabeth J Pyatt click here to access email|