The LINGUIST List is dedicated to providing information on language and language analysis, and to providing the discipline of linguistics with the infrastructure necessary to function in the digital world. LINGUIST is a free resource, run by linguistics students and faculty, and supported primarily by your donations. Please support LINGUIST List during the 2016 Fund Drive.
Ask-A-Linguist Message Details
|Subject:||Morphemes for plurals|
|Question:||Are there any languages whose standard method of showing plurality separates the morpheme or phrase that indicates it from the root word it refers to?|
Yes, at least one, Kawki of the Jaqi family of languages. In these languages the singular/plural distinction is not native. Certain suffixes in Jaqaru and in Aymara have been pressed into service to act as pluralizers, in reaction to the dominant language Spanish. The lack of a plural does NOT mean singular and such use is optional in all cases. But to your question. In Kawki the form used for the plural is the same as in Jaqaru, kuna, but is a separate word, defined precisely as the other two linguists so defined it: other things can come between the item and the 'plural' marker, and it can stand alone. This was a surprise to find and most of the published materials write it as a suffix (they need correction). The stress patterns in Kawki also indicate a separate word. The example here is part of a very very long sentence: misa\t jarp\q"\shi\sh\\k\ishu\\ \\uk"uk"\p\\ illpa\p\w kun\j,
|Reply From:||M J Hardman click here to access email|