Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login

The LINGUIST List is dedicated to providing information on language and language analysis, and to providing the discipline of linguistics with the infrastructure necessary to function in the digital world. LINGUIST is a free resource, run by linguistics students and faculty, and supported by your donations. Please support LINGUIST List during the 2017 Fund Drive.

Ask-A-Linguist Message Details

Subject: Written Language as a Cultural Artefact
Question: In The History of Britain Revealed, M J Harper states ''There are good reasons to believe that possession of a written language (and more especially the development of artificial languages for purposes of writing) is the key to understanding the whole of Ancient History. Hebrew and Latin will in time be recognised alongside Old Norse, Classical Greek, Sanskrit, Punic, Sumerian Cuneiform, Egyptian hieroglyphs and other 'non-demotic' languages as being essentially cultural artefacts adopted for a purpose, and not, as linguists insist, merely the surviving record of what ordinary people spoke''. To what extent would the panel members agree/disagree with this statement?
Reply: Whenever you hear the expression "not linguists insist" there is a high probability that the speaker has little idea of what linguists actually think. Very few linguists believe that written languages is identical to spoken language, particularly when there is a long history of written language in the culture. This is true of modern English and it was true of Latin. On the other hand, the written language is based on some stage of a spoken language, particularly when a culture first begins to use writing as a tool, so there is data to be gathered. Since written records are often the only data we have, linguists have to use written records to track linguistic phenomena. But linguists are never happier than when piles of graffitti, dialogue or other "trivial" pieces of writing are found because they do tend to be closer to language of the ordinary person.
Reply From: Elizabeth J Pyatt      click here to access email
Date: 26-Apr-2013
Other Replies:
  1. Re: Written Language as a Cultural Artefact    Geoffrey Richard Sampson     (26-Apr-2013)
  2. Re: Written Language as a Cultural Artefact    James L Fidelholtz     (26-Apr-2013)
  3. Re: Written Language as a Cultural Artefact    Anthea Fraser Gupta     (27-Apr-2013)

Back to Most Recent Questions