Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info

The LINGUIST List is dedicated to providing information on language and language analysis, and to providing the discipline of linguistics with the infrastructure necessary to function in the digital world. LINGUIST is a free resource, run by linguistics students and faculty, and supported primarily by your donations. Please support LINGUIST List during the 2016 Fund Drive.

Ask-A-Linguist Message Details

Subject: Sicilian Language
Question: Researching Sicilian language (not dialects), I have found two ''sub-groups'': 1) Sicilian of the Italo-Dalmatian parent sub-group (also referred to as Calabro-Sicilian or Sicilianu or Siculu) and 2) Sicilian of the Ligurian-Sicilian sub-group. Both are from the Indo-European or Indo-Hittite family. Questions: 1. What is meant by ''parent sub-group''? 2. Is Indo-European the same as Indo-Hittite? 3. Elsewhere, I've found ''Gallo-Sicilian'' listed as a language. Is Gallo- Sicilian the same as Ligurian-Sicilian?
Reply: I'm afraid I know nothing about Sicilian languages. But I can answer one or two of your questions. "Indo-European" is the name commonly used for the language family to which English and Italian and many others belong, and it was investigated rather thoroughly in the 19th century. But then I think early in the 20th century (I would need to check the date) it was argued, persuasively, that a long-extinct language of Asia Minor, Hittite, was related to the Indo-European languages but related as a cousin rather than as a daughter, if I could put it that way; so that arguably "Indo-European" is not the name of a "most inclusive" family, and it was suggested that "Indo-Hittite" would be a better name. So effectively, yes, these are two names for the same language family, but one of them emphasizes a recently-discovered family member. "Parent sub-group" seems transparent to me so I am not sure what your question is really asking. Languages form groups that are closely related, i.e. had relatively recent common ancestors, and they in turn form groups at a higher level, i.e. their common ancestors are further back in time, and so on. So for instance the Romance languages and the Celtic languages are two groups of the Indo-European family, but I believe they are believed to belong together as more closely related than other Indo-European groups of languages such as Germanic, Slavonic, etc.; hence the group of languages called Italo-Celtic would be the parent sub-group of the Italic languages (including Latin and its descendant Romance languages) and the Celtic languages. Q. 3 is one where I fear I am completely ignorant. Regards, Geoffrey Sampson
Reply From: Geoffrey Richard Sampson      click here to access email
 
Date: 13-Aug-2012
 
Other Replies:
  1. Re: Sicilian Language    Elizabeth J Pyatt     (18-Sep-2012)

Back to Most Recent Questions