Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login

The LINGUIST List is dedicated to providing information on language and language analysis, and to providing the discipline of linguistics with the infrastructure necessary to function in the digital world. LINGUIST is a free resource, run by linguistics students and faculty, and supported by your donations. Please support LINGUIST List during the 2017 Fund Drive.

Ask-A-Linguist Message Details

Subject: What happens at the boundary of a phonological code-switch?
Question: I want to embed a Japanese word into my English speech, but I want to be faithful to the Japanese pronunciation, so I enter a ''Japanese pronunciation mode''. Briefly, I understand this as an example of code-switching. For example, the Japanese word for thank you is [aɾiɡatoː]<あ りがとう>. Now I want to say ''it is {a/an} aɾiɡatoː'', or alternatively if [koaɾiɡatoː] was the word I would want to say ''it is {a/an} koaɾiɡatoː''. The assumption is that I am going to be 100% prosodically and segmentally faithful to the embedded Japanese word. To be precise, let # be the switch point. Then English phonology imposes upon you the obligation /a/->[an] / _V But if you actually say [it is an aɾiɡatoː] (and this seems to be the observed form) you didn't apply the above rule, but a rule of the form /a/->[an] / _#V This seems contradictory to your intention to code switch; the intention was for V to be under the sole purchase of Japanese phonology, but clearly V has participated in a rule of English phonology. I don't understand why, when under the assumption of faithful code switching, a foreign import can alter the host sentence.
Reply: I agree with Prof Sampson that "faithful code switching" in a formal sense is not something to be worried about. It's fine to use correct Japanese pronunciation, but there is a lot of variation in how to approach it. Code switching "in the wild", that is among speakers fluent in the two or more languages that they are using, is generally spontaneous and can be regarded as sloppy as in derogatory term "Spanglish". Hence there are very few formal "rules". Do what makes sense for you. Many linguists who study code switching often distinguish among several types. In your example, you are inserting a single word into an otherwise English sentence. Although you can attempt to pronounce the word in Japanese within the word boundary, as you have seen, it can impact English morphonology. That indicates that you are essentially speaking English (the matrix language) and inserting Japanese lexical items. Another kind of code switching, more frequent among bilinguals, has switches between phrases (clauses/prepositional phrases, etc). There the matrix or base language is much more difficult to determine. Mixed code switching like this tends to be derided by monolinguals, but it actually does follow linguistic rules in when it happens. It is a style favored by many bilinguals in casual conversation and so gives insight into how bilinguals process multiple grammars.
Reply From: Elizabeth J Pyatt      click here to access email
Date: 11-Sep-2012
Other Replies:
  1. Re: What happens at the boundary of a phonological code-switch?    Geoffrey Richard Sampson     (11-Sep-2012)
  2. Re: What happens at the boundary of a phonological code-switch?    Madalena Cruz-Ferreira     (11-Sep-2012)
  3. Re: What happens at the boundary of a phonological code-switch?    James L Fidelholtz     (11-Sep-2012)
  4. Re: What happens at the boundary of a phonological code-switch?    Anthea Fraser Gupta     (13-Sep-2012)

Back to Most Recent Questions