Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info

The LINGUIST List is dedicated to providing information on language and language analysis, and to providing the discipline of linguistics with the infrastructure necessary to function in the digital world. LINGUIST is a free resource, run by linguistics students and faculty, and supported primarily by your donations. Please support LINGUIST List during the 2016 Fund Drive.

Ask-A-Linguist Message Details

Subject: Post-verbal manner adverbial position in Mandarin
Question: I am beginning to learn Mandarin and, having learnt the rule that modifiers precede heads, I am a bit puzzled by the fact that whereas APs, PPs, clauses followed by ''de'', and higher adverbials do follow it strictly, manner adverbials do not precede verbs. Furthermore, there seems to exist an adjacency requirement (between the verb and the adverbial) that forbids an object after a transitive verb when a manner adverbial is present. For example, as far as I know, ''He speaks Chinese very well'' must be translated as either (1)''ta1 shuo1 zhong1wen2(,?) shuo1 de hen3 hao3'', where adjacency holds at the expense of verb repetition, or (2) ''ta1 zhong1wen2 shuo1 de hen3 hao3'', where it entails a violation of canonical VO order. Inexplicably, (3) *''ta1 shuo1 zhong1wen2 de hen3 hao3'', where the canonical VO order is observed, is considered bad, and so is (4) ''*ta1 hen3 hao3 shuo1 zhong1wen2'', which satisfies both canonical V
Reply: From my moderate knowledge of Chinese, the pattern you give of things one can and can't say sounds right. But since I don't believe that human language is governed by "universal principles", I don't see any room for a "why" question: surely, that is just the way Chinese is? Geoffrey Sampson
Reply From: Geoffrey Richard Sampson      click here to access email
Date: 29-Oct-2012

Back to Most Recent Questions