Ask-A-Linguist Message Details
|Subject:||Relationship between Imply/Infer, Throw/Catch|
Is there a term or name for the special relation each of these words
has to the other, i.e. imply/infer, throw/catch?
I always tell my students ''your verb is aimed in the wrong direction''
but if there is a good linguistic term for this, I'd like to know it.
Thanks so much.
Asst. Professor and Interim Director of the Writing Center
Kendall College of Art and Design
Grand Rapids, MI
You seem to be looking for an explanation like the one Karen Blue wrote in 2001
http://grammartips.homestead.com/imply.html where the terms <sender, receiver,
message> are applied to the arguments for each of the verbs imply and infer. These
are semantic relationships. A sender implies and a receiver infers. The syntactic
roles (subject, direct object, indirect object) play here also. Notice that part of what
(literate, fluent) adults know is that the verb "selects" which semantic role becomes
the syntactic subject.
Different verbs may select for other semantic attributes. "Cheri ate a motorbike" is
wrong because the verb requires that the object be something edible. However, you
might come back and say "I devoured the new Grisham novel," and I think we'd agree
you're speaking metaphorically. Poetry and literary language, and jokes all take
advantage of the metaphoric options. But I digress.
Other three-argument verbs include throw/catch, bring/take, give/receive and
several others. These are sometimes called ditransitive, in a technical discussion.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ditransitive_verb gives an introductory description of
how this term used.
And while you didn't ask, comprise/compose might be another pair that potentially
confuses your students, perhaps partially from the sound-alike and spell-alike
similarities. Grammar Girl had a guest writer Bonnie Trega who offers her views on
how to use this pair correctly.
Your own explanation may be most memorable and satisfying to the students: I like
the metaphor you're drawing on. Perhaps you can slightly elaborate it with these
ideas of semantic relationships (meaning categories) and syntactic roles (structural
|Reply From:||Nancy J. Frishberg click here to access email|