The LINGUIST List is dedicated to providing information on language and language analysis, and to providing the discipline of linguistics with the infrastructure necessary to function in the digital world. LINGUIST is a free resource, run by linguistics students and faculty, and supported primarily by your donations. Please support LINGUIST List during the 2016 Fund Drive.
Ask-A-Linguist Message Details
|Subject:||Causes of Loss of Inflection|
|Question:||I am very interested in the growth and decay of the process of inflection in language. As you know, Latin and ancient Greek were highly inflected languages, as were many other ancient Indo- European tongues (Old Slavonic, Sanskrit, etc). My question is: why is it that inflection decayed over time in nearly every one of these old languages? Does technological development somehow trigger inflectional decay?|
|Reply:||No. Some situations are more stable than others, is all. What happened to Latin is instructive. Latin's paradigms were very tightly organized, with lots of cues to gender, case, and number on the nouns, for instance. But the cues were all at the end of the word. And the ends of a word are where it wears away. A few very common and natural sound changes occurred at the ends of words (loss of long vowels and final /m/, for instance), and most of the distinctions made in the very highly fused Latin paradigms were lost from perception, leaving syntactic constructions to take up the slack. This is an example of what's often called the "Grammaticalization Cycle": http://www.umich.edu/~jlawler/Grammaticalization.pdf|
|Reply From:||John M. Lawler click here to access email|