Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login

The LINGUIST List is dedicated to providing information on language and language analysis, and to providing the discipline of linguistics with the infrastructure necessary to function in the digital world. LINGUIST is a free resource, run by linguistics students and faculty, and supported by your donations. Please support LINGUIST List during the 2017 Fund Drive.

Ask-A-Linguist Message Details

Subject: That that
Question: Whenever I've come across the use of ''that'' being used twice consecutively, it's always bothered me. For example, ''That that is is. That that is not is not. Is that it? It is.'' I recognize the two uses of the word, but I suppose I'm wondering why, linguistically, there wasn't a better vehicle created to handle the redundancy of this word? Does this happen in other languages?
Reply: These examples are, as Professor Sampson said, deliberately chosen to play on the two meanings of 'that'. And this is an essential part of all languages. All languages have multiple meanings for words, and all languages have homonyms. In all languages there can be puns and playfulness. Languages develop in social contexts and do not have to be functional in the same way as computer coding has to be. Incidentally, what we have here isn't redundancy, as "*That is not is not" is not grammatical. Redundancy is repetition of the same information, and is an essential part of language. For example take the Standard English sentence: "Those two cats are black." The plurality of the cats is supplied FOUR times (plural determiner, number, plural noun, plural concord on verb). Three of these are redundant, but redundancy helps the hearer. With some redundancy, it is more likely that a hearer will get the message. The same principle applies in engineering -- redundancy makes an aeroplane much safer! Anthea
Reply From: Anthea Fraser Gupta      click here to access email
Date: 21-Jul-2013
Other Replies:
  1. Re: That that    Robert A Papen     (18-Jul-2013)
  2. Re: That that    Elizabeth J Pyatt     (22-Jul-2013)
  3. Re: That that    Susan D Fischer     (19-Jul-2013)
  4. Re: That that    Geoffrey Richard Sampson     (19-Jul-2013)
  5. Re: That that    Madalena Cruz-Ferreira     (18-Jul-2013)

Back to Most Recent Questions