The LINGUIST List is dedicated to providing information on language and language analysis, and to providing the discipline of linguistics with the infrastructure necessary to function in the digital world. LINGUIST is a free resource, run by linguistics students and faculty, and supported primarily by your donations. Please support LINGUIST List during the 2016 Fund Drive.
Ask-A-Linguist Message Details
|Subject:||discrepancy of translation of Bally's sentence|
|Question:||Eugenio Coseriu cites Bally's sentence (from linguistique generale et linguistique francaise p.18)in his book [Sincronia, diacronia e historia 1p.]'' les langues changent sans cesse et ne peuvent fonctionner qu'en ne changeant pas''. the books of Italian and Portuguese version translate respectively as follows: It. le lingue cambiano continuamente e non possono funzionare se non cambiando. Pt. as linguas mudam sem cessar e nao podem funcionar nao mundando. Nevertheless, the Russian version translates as follows: Языки неперывно изменяются,однако они могут фунционировать только неизменяясь. Japanese version translates like rus.one. Quite contrary in its meaning. Be kind enough to let me know why such discrepancy happens in translation, though French, Italian and Portuguese are of Romance languages. Yoshimasa Sato: amateur linguist aficionado interested in Coseriu's way of thinking regarding historical linguistic. Thanks a lot in advance.|
|Reply:||Charles Bally was stating his observation of an apparent paradox: languages change constantly, though they can’t function unless they’re stable. He then goes on to say that languages are the product of a transient balance between these opposing forces. The Italian and Portuguese translations that you quote seem to imply a different observation, that languages change constantly and can’t function unless they change. I can’t read Russian, so I can’t tell what this translation implies! I hope this helps anyway Madalena|
|Reply From:||Madalena Cruz-Ferreira click here to access email|