Featured Linguist!

Jost Gippert: Our Featured Linguist!

"Buenos dias", "buenas noches" -- this was the first words in a foreign language I heard in my life, as a three-year old boy growing up in developing post-war Western Germany, where the first gastarbeiters had arrived from Spain. Fascinated by the strange sounds, I tried to get to know some more languages, the only opportunity being TV courses of English and French -- there was no foreign language education for pre-teen school children in Germany yet in those days. Read more



Donate Now | Visit the Fund Drive Homepage

Amount Raised:

$34890

Still Needed:

$40110

Can anyone overtake Syntax in the Subfield Challenge ?

Grad School Challenge Leader: University of Washington


Publishing Partner: Cambridge University Press CUP Extra Publisher Login
amazon logo
More Info

Ask-A-Linguist Message Details

Subject: discrepancy of translation of Bally's sentence
Question: Eugenio Coseriu cites Bally's sentence (from linguistique generale et linguistique francaise p.18)in his book [Sincronia,
diacronia e historia 1p.]'' les langues changent sans cesse et ne
peuvent fonctionner qu'en ne changeant pas''.

the books of Italian and Portuguese version translate respectively as follows:
It. le lingue cambiano continuamente e non possono funzionare se
non cambiando.
Pt. as linguas mudam sem cessar e nao podem funcionar nao mundando.

Nevertheless, the Russian version translates as follows:
Языки неперывно изменяются,однако они могут фунционировать
только неизменяясь.

Japanese version translates like rus.one.

Quite contrary in its meaning.

Be kind enough to let me know why such discrepancy happens in
translation, though French, Italian and Portuguese are of Romance languages.

Yoshimasa Sato: amateur linguist aficionado interested in Coseriu's way of thinking regarding historical linguistic.
Thanks a lot in advance.

Reply: Presumably the translator has just made a mistake? My Russian is not good, but it looks to me as though "ne-" has mistakenly been prefixed to the last word, which would be an easy mistake to make when the previous occurrence of the same root did correctly have the "ne-" prefix.

You don't quote the Japanese and I probably couldn't read it if you did, so I can't comment on that.

Geoffrey Sampson
Reply From: Geoffrey Richard Sampson      click here to access email
 
Date: 30-Jul-2013
 
Other Replies:
  1. Re: discrepancy of translation of Bally's sentence    Madalena Cruz-Ferreira     (29-Jul-2013)

Back to Most Recent Questions