| The basic outlines are simple enough. As a 17-year old sophomore in 1946, I was pretty
much disillusioned with college and thinking of dropping out. Through shared political
interests, I met Zellig Harris, and in conversation became interested in his linguistic
work, at first his history of Canaanite dialects, which related to matters I had some
familiarity with, having read my father's doctoral dissertation on the 13th century
Hebrew grammarian David Kimhi and other work on Semitic linguistics; and the one freshman
course that I really found engaging was Arabic, with a fine scholar, Giorgio Levi della
Vida. |
|
| Harris suggested that I proof-read his Methods of Structural Linguistics, my
introduction to the modern field, and take his graduate courses, then on discourse
analysis. He also suggested that I take graduate courses with several outstanding
figures at the university, among them Nelson Goodman (philosophy) and Nathan Fine
(mathematics), which I also did. By then the enthusiasm had returned -- and in
retrospect, I suspect that Harris, a remarkable person who had an enormous influence on a
great many young people, was subtly inducing me to go on in college.
|
|
| By 1948 I was also working on my own on an undergraduate thesis, a generative grammar of Modern Hebrew, mostly morphophonemics (revised 1951 version published in 1979). And then on from there.
|
|
|
|
Dan Parker nominated Noam Chomsky because of his influences on social and political thought as well as his advancements in generative grammar
|
|
|
Back to 'Linguist of the Day' page
|