Editor for this issue: Naomi Ogasawara <naomi
linguistlist.org>
Neologisms & productivity Dear linguists, I am searching for discussions in the linguistic literature on the motives for neologising. I am thinking of lexical innovations created by word-formation processes. Why is "multi-" a popular prefix today, as exemplified by an increasing number of new types of this prefix in English corpora? Why are lexical means of marking small size, value, etc. in English being displaced by innovative diminutive prefixes such as mini- and micro- ? It is clear that the degree of productivity of affixes such multi-, micro-, mini- and other 'vogue' affixes has increased considerably. But the question is why. I am looking for references on the extralinguistic (social, cultural, register, cognitive, textual, etc.) factors that seem to intervene in the process of lexical innovaton by means of WF processes? I'll post a summary of the messages I receive plus a list of bibliographic references on neologising. Thank you for your attention Josi Ramsn Varela University of Santiago jrvperezMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuehotmail.com iaramon
usc.es
Dear linguists, I wonder if there has been any reports about acquisition order of formal features in the field? I suppose last year Dr Roger Hawkins (University of Essex) gave a paper at Pacslrf in which he proposed that L2 learners have particular problems with uninterpretable features. The title was "The inaccessability of formal features of functional categories in second language acquisition". Unfortunately I don't have access to such papers, would you be kind enough to provide me with any related information? Please let me know more about interpretability of formal features, learnability of formal features and studies which have been carried out with direct reference to Checking Theory and Second Language Acquisition if possible. Can any one provide me with Dr Roger Hawkins e mail too? All my heartiest thanks to you in advance. Arash BehazinMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue