Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen
linguistlist.org>
Larry Chong has raised some interesting questions here. My expertise is in email so I was pleased to see the viewpoint from an IRC perspective. > 1. Why netizns love to use as many acronyms as they could? > Ex) By the way --->BTW > > ****the tendency toward the use of reduced forms may reflect the > importance of minimizing the effort required to communicate one's message. > The pace of communicative exchange in such an environment is pretty rapid, > especially among those who are "veteran" users and who feel they belong to > an online community or communities, such as a an IRC channel. > > **** to show their strong ties.... > linguistic economy > > > 2. Why it occurs all over the sentences? > Ex) How are you? -->How R U? > > This particular example is a good example of the minimal effort factor. > Since the pronunciation of the letters 'R' and 'U' are equivalent to the > words 'are' and 'you', then use of the letters would allow one to get the > same message across with only two keystrokes instead of six. This may not > seem like that big a difference, but when one is talking to several people > in the same channel or separately, things tend to become very fast-paced. > So anything that can be done to "say more with less" is definitely a plus. If this analysis is correct then we should expect shifts in spelling as well from good -> gud, know -> kno, ... Perhaps the simplification of English spelling is finally under way. The fascinating part for me is that the culture of IRC effects the culture of email which in turn effects the culture of advertising which effects everybody's language. I would expect the diachronic linguists would find this highly volitile, rapidly changing language use of particular interest. Professor Chong is currect when he said, "I am sure that the more time netizens spend on line(CMC), the more topics we will have to research and resolve". Michael L. McHale Senior Research Scientist MNIS TextWise Labs mchaleMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuetextwise.com