Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen
linguistlist.org>
To Martin and in agreement with Nancy: Yes this is very complex, also the Deaf people who this affects normally don't have their say, and hearing people working in the field try to interpret what we pick up from them and then transfer these ideas to people who see deafness and sign-language in a very different to way to us, more like pathology or intervention. But the CI issue is a symptom of today's trendy topics in science, it fits with brain imaging, molecular genetics and bionic limbs. Recently I had a conversation with a journalist who was disappointed to hear that CIs weren't the miracle cure for deafness, she was surprised that a lot of born deaf people saw them as a threat especially to the human rights of children. This was not the view she had got from her CI specialist. CI research is vastly more funded than linguistic, pedagogic or social science type research within Deaf studies. And the results are far from clear, especially when all people who cant hear regardless of etiology are classed as one homogenous group: 'the deaf'. There is a sophisticated debate and forum of discussion going on in the Deaf community in Britain about some of these issues, a series of PhD dissertations from the University of Bristol written by Deaf people is one example of this. Also the Deaf nation symposium held at the University of Central Lancashire a couple of years ago. But this rarely makes it to the level of being discussed on panels of medical research councils. For any specific reading or references for the British CI debate please email me direct - ----- Gary Morgan Dept of Linguistics, UCL, London tel: 0171 4193162 (voice/text) fax: 0171 3834108Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Sign language is not my area of specialisation, but I have been fascinated by the discussion on CIs. Lorraine Leeson mentioned the need to get funding for documenting SLs. Is it the case that all/most sign languages do not have a written form, and that therefore for L1 sign language speakers all written texts are in a foreign language? _________________________ Clodagh Lynam Arts Faculty Fellow Deparment of Linguistics University College DublinMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue