Editor for this issue: Anthony Rodrigues Aristar <aristar
linguistlist.org>
Carl Mills (LINGUIST 10.28) rightly laments the virtual absence of linguistics in academia. As one whose department (Columbia) closed just as work on the dissertation was beginning, I am moved to respond. My sense is that linguistics, in the '60s and '70s particularly, made itself irrelevant by indeed proclaiming its irrelevance to such important fields of inquiry as communication, literature, and society. This act of burning bridges perhaps can be traced back to the American descriptivists' misguided attempt to construct an "autonomous" linguistics. Simultaneously, many theoretical linguists have appeared to disdain the peripheral fields that do represent attempts to make linguistics relevant to something, foremost among them (i.e., at the bottom), so-called applied linguistics. What does linguistics need to do? Come to terms with the fact that language functions in a social and meaningful context, not in a vacuum. Joseph Davis City College of New YorkMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue