Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen
linguistlist.org>
Public Announcement of the Phonology 2000 Symposium Harvard and MIT, April 30-May 1, 1999 The purpose of the symposium is to gather some 35 leading phonologists to initiate a substantive debate concerning the relative empirical and theoretical merits of the two dominant models of human phonological knowledge, derivational phonology (DP) and Optimality Theory (OT). Central to DP, which was employed by most phonologists until this decade, is the proposition that the surface representation of words is derived in a deterministic fashion from their underlying representations by the application of a series of ordered rules. The introduction of OT has resulted in a drastic realignment of this outlook and of the field of phonology as a whole, in terms both of the questions that are being asked and of the way in which these questions are being addressed. In OT the underlying and surface representations are related by means of violable constraints, which reflect aspects of universal well-formed outputs, and the differences among languages are attributed exclusively to differences in the rankings of the constraints. To this point, proponents of DP have failed to mount a systematic response to the problems raised or implied by OT. By the same token, the adherents of OT have yet to tackle the challenge of demonstrating that rule-based phonology is inviable. As a result, many important issues that have been raised by the coexistence of these two phonological perspectives have not been adequately addressed. Perhaps the most important among these is the lack of a systematic comparison of the two competing theories, with the aim of determining their relative merits on both formal and empirical grounds. The purpose of the present symposium is to serve as a starting point for such a comparative evaluation of OT and DP. In particular, we expect to discuss data and formal issues that highlight critical differences between the two theories, with the ultimate goal of determining not only which of the two approaches is to be preferred but also-and more importantly-why. Ideally the participants will leave the symposium with a deeper appreciation of the problems that each model can solve and of the problems that each may have difficulty in solving. The Phonology 2000 Symposium will be held on Friday, April 30, and Saturday, May 1, 1999. The sessions on the first day will be held at Harvard, and those on the second day will be at MIT. Admission is free, but in order to gain admission to the building on Friday, it will be necessary for individuals not affiliated with Harvard to sign in at the front desk. We apologize for this inconvenience. SCHEDULE Friday, April 30, 1999 Lamont Library, Harvard University 9-9:15 Coffee and snacks SESSION 1: General Issues 9:15-9:45 Stuart Davis, Indiana University "OT: Empirical problems and insights" 10-10:30 David Odden, Ohio State "Ordering" 10:45-11 Break for snacks SESSION 2: Syllables 11-11:30 Donca Steriade, UCLA "Word phonotactics vs. syllabic intuitions" 11:45-12:15 Francois Dell, CNRS, Paris "Syllabification with epenthesis and without: syllable structure in two Berber dialects" 12:30-2 LUNCH SESSION 3: Reduplication 2-2:30 Sharon Inkelas, Berkeley, and Cheryl Zoll, MIT "Reduplication as morphological doubling" 2:45-3:15 William Idsardi and Eric Raimy, Delaware "Reduplication and underapplication" 3:30-4 Break for more snacks SESSION 4 4-4:30 Andrea Calabrese, UConn "Glide formation, gemination, and Sievers' Law in Vedic Sanskrit" 4:45-5:15 Charles Reiss, Concordia "Acquisition and post-OT phonology" 5:30-6 Michael Hammond, Arizona "Poetic meter, feet, and acquisition" Saturday, May 1 MIT 66-110 SESSION 5: Stress 9-9:30 Ellen Broselow, SUNY-Stonybrook "Stress-epenthesis interactions in a constraint-based theory" 9:45-10:15 John Frampton, Northeastern "On iterative rules" 10:30-11 Break for snacks SESSION 6: Morphology and phonology 11-11:30 Bruce Hayes, UCLA "Burnt and Splang: Some Issues in Morphological Learning Theory" 11:45-12:15 Rolf Noyer, Penn "The basis of bases" 12:30-2 Lunch SESSION 7: Features 2-2:30 Diana Archangeli, Arizona "On Constraint Motivation" 2:45-3:15 Keren Rice, Toronto "Featural markedness" 3:30-4 Break SESSION 8: General Issues 4-4:30 Michael Kenstowicz, MIT "Transderivational relations" 4:45-5:15 Mark Hale, Concordia "Historical Phonology and Phonological Theory in the 21st Century" There will be 15 minutes for discussion after each paper. In addition to the speakers above, the invited discussants will include: Abby Cohn, Cornell Ben Hermans, Tilburg Paul Kiparsky, Stanford Mark Aronoff, SUNY-Stonybrook Nick Clements, Paris Elan Dresher, Toronto Eulalia Bonet, Barcelona Jim Harris, MIT Ellen Kaisse, Washington Alec Marantz, MIT David Pesetsky, MIT Sylvain Bromberger, MIT Steve Anderson, Yale Jean-Roger Vergnaud, USC Please address inquiries to vauxMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuefas.harvard.edu. Bert Vaux, Harvard Morris Halle, MIT co-organizers