Editor for this issue: Brett Churchill <brett
linguistlist.org>
Dear all The term 'move' has been used by Bellack et al (1966), Sinclair and Coulthard (1975), and then by those in genre analysis (e.g. Swales). However, I still can't find any definition of 'move' in the books by the above authors. Does anyone know any references where the term 'move' is defined. - ------------------------------------------------------ Tan Bee Tin University College Chichester, UK Email: T.BeetinMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuechihe.ac.uk
Dear Linguists, I am working on a portuguese verb form which is used in many acceptions as it preceeds an expression with preposition, or an adjectiv, or an adverb. It is FICAR. I've found 15 cases where this verb has different meanings but I have a problem: I've just found that in two of these cases the meaning of the verb is not completed by its arguments but by another constituent which comes after the expression with preposition or the adjectiv. 1. Ele ficou magro enquanto esteve preso. ficou magro = FICAR + Adjectiv enquanto esteve preso = defines the type of the predicate as a Basic Estative Predicate because of the notion of duration in time 2. Ele ficou magro depois de um longo regime. ficou magro = FICAR + Adjectiv depois de um longo regime = defines the type of the predicate as a Basic Processual Predicate because of the notion of consequence, altough we have here the same lexical forms (ele ficou magro) as in the first example. As I'm working in a functional approach (Dik, Peres) I would appreciate knowing of some paper or article about predication of verbs in special cases like these, but with a pragmatic approach. Thanks in advance. Ida Rebelo Pontificia Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro - BrasilMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue