Editor for this issue: Andrew Carnie <carnie
linguistlist.org>
Editors: Artemis Alexiadou and Chris Wilder Date: 1998 Title: Possessor, predicates and movement in the determiner phrase Publisher: John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam/Philadelphia Number of Pages: 386 Reviewed by Michael Moss, Synopsis: This volume of the Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today series presents 12 papers dealing primarily with the developments in generative grammar regarding the so-called Determiner Phrase and its parallels with the clause. Ground breaking work in this area was done by Abney in 1987 in his doctoral dissertation: The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. The papers in this volume also draw heavily from work done by Chomsky (1995), Kayne (1994) and Szablocsi (1983, 1987, 1994). The main point of exploration dominating all of the papers is the parallel between Determiner Phrases and clauses. Importantly, the research presented is based on a variety of European languages, German, Swedish, Norwegian, Dutch, Italian, Romanian, Bulgarian, Albanian and some Hungarian. While the most research is conducted on Germanic languages, the information gained from other language groups, including examples from non-Indoeuropean languages gives excellent insight into the conclusions presented. Critical Evaluation: The volume on the whole is very well written. Each of the authors presents his/her research and conclusions very clearly and in a well documented manner. Parallels between noun phrases (now called determiner phrases) and clauses have long been noted, especially concerning the subject-like relation between possessors and nominalized verbs as in "the enemy's destruction of the city" or "Kolumbus' Entdeckung Amerikas". These papers take such parallels a step further - implying that movement, extraction, raising and other 'clausal' phenomena are also present in the DP. Obviously, another interesting area in DP research concerns possessors, which have classically been seen as the "Subjects" of DPs. Various treatments over the years have seen the possessor as a kind of genitive case assignment, or even as morphologically present "determiner" features. The first five articles in this volume deal directly with this problem, presenting various interpretations. The idea of a strong-weak-clitic division for personal pronouns is introduced by Cardinaletti. The next paper, by Schoorlemmer researches the types of possessive pronouns found in Germanic, Slavic and Romance languages, concentrating on the adjective like behavior of these pronouns. Delsing proposes that possessor phrases and genitive phrases be kept distinct, using data from Scandinavian dialects. Lindauer investigates genitive case licensing within DP, finding that prenominal proper names which appear to be genitive are, in fact, adjectival, and further that the "subject" position of the DP is actually a reserved adjectival position. The morphological aspects of genitive case spell out in DP is covered by Gallman, who raises the question of 'underspecification' in case assignment, using German data as his base. The remaining articles look into the DP problem from the perspective of Kayne (1994), which concentrated on the syntax of possession and modification. First Den Dikken considers the possibility that DP's are in fact predicate structures using "N-of-a-N" structures as his starting point. He also has an interesting extension of his theory covering English possessives such as "a picture of John", "a picture of John's" and "John's picture". Next Corver takes Den Dikken's ideas as the starting point for an analysis of pseudopartatives, relating "a bottle/glass/container of wine" with "N-of-a-N" constructions. Zamparelli attempts to link constructions involving "kind", "sort" etc. with partatives, using raising and the introduction of a new semantic operator "Re'" which separates the "residue" of a group determined in an "of" phrase. The "Re'" operator is also accompanied by an RP (Residue Phrase) which introduces "of" into partitive constructions. The multiple determiner phenomenon in Greek is investigated seriously by Alexiadou and Wilder in their article, leading them to the conclusion that each adjective phrase in Greek be interpreted as a separate reduced clausal phrase under the DP. Continuing this line of thought, Dimitrova-Vulchanova and Giusti examine enclitic definite articles in Albanian, Romanian and Bulgarian with a non standard interpretation of the results. Finally Uriagereka looks at the differences between noun phrases headed by proper names and those headed by common nouns. He argues that common nouns are more flexible than proper names due to the fact that they are syntactically complex, while proper names are 'syntactic atoms' with no internal structure. This book will be very useful to people doing research in the minimalist framework especially due to the data gathered from Germanic and other European languages. It is obvious that this kind of data increases the accuracy with which generative models can describe the inner workings of language. While the basis of the volume is the DP-hypothesis as set forth by Abney (1987), the articles take the idea further, testing and modyfing the original hypothesis to account for new data. Several of the articles also delve into the important question of the Determiner itself, and its syntactic and semantic roles in language. Bibliography: Abney, S. 1987. The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect, Doctoral dissertation, MIT. Chomsky, Noam. 1995.The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, Mass.:MIT. Kayne, R. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Szablocsi, A. 1983. The possessor that ran away from home. The linguistic Review 3:70-96 Szablocsi, A. 1987. Functional categories in the noun phrase. in I. Kenesci, ed., Approaches to Hungarian, vol. 2. University of Budapest. Szablocsi, A. 1994. The Noun Phrase. in F. Kiefer and K. Kiss eds. The Syntactic Structure of Hungarian (Syntax and Semantics vol. 27). San Diego:Academic Press, 179-274. Biographical information: I am currently writing my doctoral dissertation at the University of Gdansk, Poland on "Agreement phenomena in generative grammar". My research interests include: generative syntax, morphology, the "minimalist approach" and models of grammar which limit the use of movement and transformations in their explanations of linguistic phenomena.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue