Editor for this issue: Jody Huellmantel <jody
linguistlist.org>
Much has been written about the influence of the pre- World War II Prague School on generative phonology. I am interested in the extent to which Prague School conceptions have influenced North American and Western European SYNTAX, both generative and nongenerative. For example, the use by generativists of distinctive features on morphological and syntactic elements presumably derives from Prague. Likewise, one would assume that Praguean work on functional sentence perspective has influenced current functional linguistics. Has anything been written about 'direct lines of transmission' between pre-war Praguean linguistics and the development of modern formal and functional linguistics? Do such direct lines of transmission exist? I'll summarize. Fritz Newmeyer fjnMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueu.washington.edu
Dear all, Our department introduces the principle of teacher-as-researcher for training language teachers; they are invited to reflect on their own teaching through an action research assignment. E.g., by suggesting a hypothesis for a language lesson, teaching it, reflecting, problematizing, etc. Is there anyone who is working in the same field? Any suggestions on how to combine action research and language teaching are welcome. advTHANKSance, Bart. Bart.BonamieMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuerug.ac.be \\\ /// http://allserv.rug.ac.be/~bbonamie U. Ghent (Belgium) | | http://www.student.rug.ac.be/germania ICQ: 19284239 (.)^(.) http://www.student.rug.ac.be/fk =========================oOO==(_)==OOo=====================================