Editor for this issue: Jody Huellmantel <jody
linguistlist.org>
Greetings all! Not to trivialize the point or be overly critical, but I've just read Mike Maxwell's posting (LINGUIST 10.84) regarding ADJ => V transposition and concluded that there is nothing new here. Sorry, Mike :) 1. A poor example. Although the word "new" is normally used as an adjective, in this case it is being used as the tag for a command line. Any tag, because it bears the quality of nomenclature, is normally regarded as an N and not an ADJ. Thus, "new", although being an adjective, is the name of a program that creates new documents. In the text supplied, therefore, the expression "Newed" (note also the capitalization) appears as a PP formed from an N, not an ADJ. 2. Adjective can be Nouns and Nouns can be Verbs. Give that ADJ to N transposition is quite common, i.e., "the young", "the old", "the new", et al, that N to V transposition is also quite common, i.e., "to demonize", "to industrialize", "to fantasize", et al, and the existence of the transitive property of equality (if A=B and B=C, then A=C), ADJ to V transposition seems to be something that we should have been expected (in fact, "industrialize" is an ADJ to V transposition). This is especially so given that all participles, either present or past, may be used as ADJ. On a side note, one of my favorite episodes of "The Simpsons" is the one where the town honors its founder, and we learn that his motto involved the V "embiggens" (if anyone knows the motto, please send it to me). 3. Nice try though. Mike has hit on an important point, however. That is that sometimes we get too busy looking for the major breakthroughs that we take the simple stuff for granted, and overlook obvious answers to our questions in our zeal to uncover the truth (hey, we've all done it at one time or another - I'll be the first to admit it). In his message, Mike has served to remind us of this fact, AND given us an opportunity to re-examine POS transpositions. Thanks! Sincerely, Sean M. Witty, PBK Linguist/Foreign Language Specialist Kwangwoon University-KILE, Adjunct Professor of English http://members.tripod.com/~wittysan/Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
I should first disclose that I'm one who views parts of speech not as linguistic, but as message, categories. Having said that, I suspect that the list of "adjectives" that can be used as "verbs" might be somewhat larger than imagined once one takes into account all those English words that are used so routinely both ways that they are recognized (in dictionaries, e.g.) as two parts of speech. Just off the top of my head I think of: slow, short, yellow, brown, gray, pretty, sour. Joseph Davis City College of New YorkMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue