Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen
linguistlist.org>
Some time ago I ran into a book which quoted an article in which I used the term Antipassive. The author took me to task for giving a description that was too vague. I had not thought I needed to stress the definition of the term as if I had invented it. However, other things I have read or heard since lead me to believe that this term is indeed not well known or understood. Antipassive forms and constructions are most often found together with the Ergative, another concept that is not generally familiar. I would like to get some feedback on this issue, especially what linguists would consider accurate definitions of the term Antipassive. I will post a summary if applicable. Marie-Lucie Tarpent Mount Saint Vincent University Halifax, N.S. B3M 2J6 Canada marie-lucie.tarpentMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuemsvu.ca
Dear Linguists, I'm Yuka Makita, a graduate student at Nagoya University, Japan. I'm interested in a comparative and a diachronic study of existential constructions. And, now, I'd like some native speakers of Icelandic and Swedish to make grammatical judgement of some existential constructions. If you can help my work, please e-mail me <YukaMakitaMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueaol.com>. Thanks in advance, ***** Yuka Makita E-mail: YukaMakita
aol.com