Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen
linguistlist.org>
Colleagues, Surely the genesis of spelling anomalies in English arises, above all, from its "rich and varied" parenthood. At the time printing (with its potential for the propagation of "standard" forms) developed, there were many different varieties of spoken English (as, indeed, there still are). Who doesn't recall Caxton's plaintive question about whether to use "eigies" or "eyren" for what we now call "eggs"? (Apologies for my own deviant spellings!) Pyles & Algeo's The Origins and Development of the English Language (Harcourt Brace, 3d edn, 1982) is, despite its age, a relevant and readable treatment. This doesn't really bear on Moonhawk's point about how long ago written language diverged (evolved? declared independence?) from speech, except to emphasise that -- until the development of radio -- there was no vehicle for standardisation of spoken language. Written language, on the other hand, began to be set in concrete (lead, anyway) about 550 years ago; while we can trace many changes from Chaucer through Shakespeare and Dickens to Pynchon, English orthography has changed comparatively little since Caxton. Michael Lewis Department of Linguistics Macquarie UniversityMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue