Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen
linguistlist.org>
Dear linguists, I am interested in a comparison of event structures. As an example, I would like to consider English "to fetch" or German "holen". I am especially wondering how different languages express this concept - please let me know. And I'd like to know whether native speakers would say that the event structure of "to fetch" / "holen" etc. - if the language uses only one word to express the concept - consists of three subevents: 1) going to some place, 2) taking something, and 3) coming (to the deictic center). Would you say that these three subevents are on an equal level or is one or are two of them prominent? Could you even say that two of them form a subevent themselves (so that "to fetch" consists of two subevents with one subevent being composed of two subevents itself)? I would appreciate it very much to also get information on: (i) Verb serialising languages - do they depict the event structure overtly as respective occurrences of verbs describe the subevents? (ii) Are there languages that split one from the other two subevents, e.g. via literally saying "go take-come" or "go-take come"? Thanks very much! I will be happy to post a sum if you are intersted in one. Andrea SchalleyMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Hello, I am currently developing a task that is designed to capture differences in speech characteristics related to mood. I would like to have subjects read neutral sentences and then obtain a range of the fundamental frequency for the sentences. In the past, it has been shown that people who are depressed tend to have a smaller fundamental frequency range, which has been attributed to less prosodic, 'flatter' speech. My question is- is necessary to use the same sentences (i.e obtain the fundamental frequency range for 4 sentences and compare it with the fudamental frequency range for the same 4 sentences read at a different time)? In other words, would comparing the fundamental frequency between different groups of sentences (i.e. obtaining the fundamental frequency of 4 sentences and comparing it with the fundamental frequency of 4 different sentences) create a problem for interpreting what potential differences in the observed fundamental frequency ranges really mean? Thank you for your time, Jennifer BarrettMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue