Editor for this issue: James Yuells <james
linguistlist.org>
I am in the awkward position of trying to determine whether a freshman term paper is an exceptionally well-written and clear discussion of Gricean pragmatics or a shameless example of plagiary. My colleagues and I have looked at introductory texts on pragmatics but have not found a likely source. Does anybody out there recognize the following sample passages? "Let us say that Mr. Ironside is running late for an important meeting. He knows where the meeting is to be held, it is somewhere on Weissmueller Street, but he has no idea how to get there. So he stops Mrs. Emerson on the way to the grocery store and asks, "Excuse me, but do you know the shortest way to Weissmueller Street?" Mrs. Emerson, seeing that Mr. Ironside is in a hurry, starts giving him directions to the best of her ability, but it is not an easy task. Weissmueller Street is literally on the other side of town, and explaining the most efficient route through the intricate maze of squares and alleys is exceedingly hard. Although Mrs. Emerson knows perfectly well where Weissmueller Street is, she offers only a vague and largely insufficient set of directives, and at the end she adds, "...but if you take the subway you could be there in ten minutes," whereupon Mr. Ironside, who had for some reason not considered this possibility, replies, "thank you very much" and heads for the nearest subway station." Another randomly selected paragraph: 'The Maxim of Manner' "In any conversation utterances are expected to be as concise and orderly as possible. Let us say that Mrs. Baxter comes home from work one day and asks her husband how his day has been, whereupon he answers, "He ordered a chicken salad. I couldn't get the car started this morning. I had lunch with Mr. Eastwood. I think she is developing a drinking problem. I had a chicken salad too. I arrived for work almost an hour late. Miss Cox doesn't seem to be doing too well these days. We went to the little Spanish restaurant across the street from Toby's. I was fired. I left my wallet in the car...", and so forth. By this time Mrs. Baxter is probably assuming that her husband is about to have a nervous breakdown, or something to that effect. Mr. Baxter is clearly violating the maxim of manner. Although his account of the day's events is not exactly ambiguous or obscure, he fails to be orderly. His wife, as most speakers of the English language would, expects her husband to follow a chronological order when describing how his day has been, and as he does not do so she finds it very hard to form a correct idea of the situation. She also expects him to provide her with the most important information first, and in this case the most important piece of intelligence is likely to be that her husband has lost his job. In any case it is clear that Mr. Baxter has neglected the importance of being orderly." Thanks! Peter Svenonius ______________________________________________________ This message was created using 100% recycled electrons http://www.hum.uit.no/a/svenonius/Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Dear colleagues, I am preparing a module on "History of Linguistic Thought". Does anybody know videos (for teaching purposes) about that topic or related areas? Thanks Helmut Daller - -------------------------------------- Dr Helmut Daller Email: Helmut.DallerMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueuwe.ac.uk University of the West of England Frenchay Campus, Coldharbour Lane Bristol BS16 1QY Tel: 0117-344 2392 Fax: 0117-344 2820