Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen
linguistlist.org>
The following forwarded comment is on the recent extended discussion in sci.lang of the future of linguistics (originated under the sceptical heading 'Wither linguistics?'): I have only just come upon and come to the end of reading this interesting but labyrinthine thread. The important question is the significance and promise of current neurological research for progress in linguistics. Given the intensive investigation of brain-function for language using the remarkable techniques of PET, fMRI, MEG and ESP (the subject of a paper not long ago by Victoria Fromkin), students of language perhaps should be prepared to accept as their basis that language is the product of brain organisation, and must have an extended evolutionary past. As neurological research becomes increasingly sophisticated, the evidence which has to be taken into account in any theory of language function is accumulating rapidly. The work of Pulvermuller, 'Electrocortical distinction of vocabulary types', and others using similar research protocols, allows one to begin to picture how from the intersection of lexical and syntactic processes in the brain the continuous stream of well-formed and semantically valid speech can be produced. In the brain different categories of words, content words, function words, vision words, action/motor words, are associated with topographically different patterns of excitation; the brain seems to be categorising the perception of words in ways very similar to the standard analyses of the lexicon. With this topographical categorisation, one can begin to see how there must be processes for associating the different categories in ways which are equivalent to the meaning-content of a sentence, within the very large context represented by the persisting structure of dynamic memory (Schank's term). Gallese and Rizzolatti's research on mirror neurons is also encouraging (to be the subject a conference in July 'Mirror Neurons and the Evolution of Brain and Language). If the neurology and the less formalistic approaches of contemporary linguistics can begin to make sense together, a genuine and comprehensive 'Science of Language' may come into being much sooner than is often supposed. Robin Allott http://www.percep.demon.co.uk/catsat.htm http://www.percep.demon.co.uk/ email: RMAllottMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuepercep.demon.co.uk tel/fax: +44 1323 492300