Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen
linguistlist.org>
As part of his query about shwas in American English Jorge Guitart wrote < Are there underlying shwas? On Sun, 5 Mar 2000, Larry <be262Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuescn.org> wrote to Jorge <I suspect so. What about words like "cactus", "abacus", "syllabus", "phosphorous" (N), and "opus"? Jorge Guitart responds Gedanken Experiment If an improbable product were to be invented that uses cactus meat as its base and it is called cactusia, how would the word be pronunced? (It would not have a shwa in the second vowel of the morpheme cactus-.) What about the following entries in The Dictionary of Mental Health? 1. Abacusia: Unwarranted reliance on an abacus for calculation 2. Abacusic: Individual suffering from abacusia 3. Syllabusia: The desire to follow the course's syllabus too closely 4. Syllabusic: Individual suffering from syllabusia 5. Phosporousia: Obsession with the chemical element phosporous 6. Phosphorousic: see 2 and 4 7. Opusia: Malady striking the workaholic musician 8. Opusic: See 3, 4, and 6. What is the better candidate for the UR of X where X is the morpheme common to each alternant--shwa or something else? jg