Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen
linguistlist.org>
I'm a second linguistic student at Carleton University (Ottawa, Canada) and I discovered something intriguing. I would like you to evaluate what I found and comment on what it means. I talked with my syntax professor and he did not know it, so I'm assuming it is something new. An innocent looking verb "love" poses a serious problem to the subcategorization frame. Ordinarily, love requires a NP as a complement and this complement cannot be left implicit. * I love. However, if it is put into past tense, it suddenly becomes grammatical: I loved. This sounds trivial, but considering tense is a extralinguistic feature it should not, in ideal, affect subcategorization of words. I tried to come up with other word, but I could not find any other words that behave like "love." However, I found another word that may change its subcategorization with mood. The word is "plan." Ordinarily, we do not say, "I plan." (or *I planned, *I am planning, etc.) I discussed with several native speakers, but they are not sure if "I plan" is grammatical (as in "What do you do for living?" "?I plan.". I appreciate it if you can comment on this. But the sentence becomes clearly grammatical if it used in a subjunctive clause as in, "If I had planned, I would have done better." I'm suspecting that there are words that change their subcategorization with each verbal categories: valence, voice, aspect, tense, agreement (person, number, gender), and mood. Some of them are very obvious (e.g. valence, voice) but some of them are more difficult. If this is true, we may have to take another serious look at subcategorization and we may have another way of classifying verbs. - Tosh e-mail: lastcreatureMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueyahoo.com homepage: http://www.freespeech.org/lastman/index.html
Hello, I'm looking for examples of ejective dissimilation -- for example, constraints on having more than one ejective consonant in a word, so that one or more underlyingly ejective segment is deglottalized or otherwise repaired. If anyone knows of such a process I would like to hear about it -- my email address is cockerilMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuefas.harvard.edu. Thanks, MaryAnn Cockerill