Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen
linguistlist.org>
On Thu, 23 Mar 2000 08:55:50 -0600 "Geoffrey S. Nathan" <geoffnMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuesiu.edu> wrote: << It is not abstractness per se that is unlikely, but rather abstractness that only a linguistically-trained phonologist would be likely to posit. >> and Mark Mandel observed that << to a certain degree we are a self-selected subset of the population. >> In this vein, I am reminded of what Ted Lightner always used to say, namely, that for many alternations, not everybody is aware of them, even on an implicit level. Rather, these alternations are real only for "the more intelligent among us". (I always assumed he meant lingusts, but sometimes the discussions on the list--even occasionally my own--make me wonder.) Jim James L. Fidelholtz e-mail: jfidel
siu.buap.mx Posgrado en Ciencias del Lenguaje tel.: +(52-2)229-5500 x5705 Instituto de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades fax: +(01-2) 229-5681 Beneme'rita Universidad Auto'noma de Puebla, ME'XICO