LINGUIST List 11.714

Wed Mar 29 2000

Calls: Toolsets/Architecture/NLP, Second Lang Research

Editor for this issue: Jody Huellmantel <>

As a matter of policy, LINGUIST discourages the use of abbreviations or acronyms in conference announcements unless they are explained in the text.


  1. Remi Zajac, COLING-2000 Workshop on Using Toolsets and Architectures To Build NLP Systems
  2. Christina M. Higgins, Second Language Research Forum

Message 1: COLING-2000 Workshop on Using Toolsets and Architectures To Build NLP Systems

Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 14:20:02 -0700 (MST)
From: Remi Zajac <>
Subject: COLING-2000 Workshop on Using Toolsets and Architectures To Build NLP Systems

Call for submissions for the

COLING-2000 Workshop on Using Toolsets and Architectures To Build NLP Systems

Centre Universitaire, Luxembourg, 5 August 2000

( see also this call at )


The purpose of the workshop is to present the state-of-the-art on NLP
toolsets and workbenches that can be used to develop multilingual
and/or multi-applications NLP components and systems. Although
technical presentations of particular toolsets are of interest, we
would like to emphasize methodologies and practical experiences in
building components or full applications using an NLP
toolset. Combined demonstrations and paper presentations are strongly

Many toolsets have been developed to support the implementation of
single NLP components (taggers, parsers, generators, dictionaries) or
complete Natural Language Processing applications (Information
Extraction systems, Machine Translation systems). These tools aim at
facilitating and lowering the cost of building NLP systems. Since the
tools themselves are often complex pieces of software, they require a
significant amount of effort to be developed and maintained in the
first place. Is this effort worth the trouble? It is to be noted that
NLP toolsets have often been originally developed for implementing a
single component or application. In this case, why not build the NLP
system using a general programming language such as Lisp or Prolog?
There can be at least two answers. First, for pure efficiency issues
(speed and space), it is often preferable to build a parameterized
algorithm operating on a uniform data structure (e.g., a
phrase-structure parser). Second, it is harder, and often impossible,
to develop, debug and maintain a large NLP system directly written in
a general programming language.

It has been the experience of many users that a given toolset is quite
often unusable outside its environment: the toolset can be too
restricted in its purpose (e.g. an MT toolset that cannot be used for
building a grammar checker), too complex to use, or even too difficult
to install. There have been, in particular in the US under the Tipster
program, efforts to promote instead common architectures for a given
set of applications (primarily IR and IE in Tipster; see also the
Galaxy architecture of the DARPA Communicator project). Several
software environments have been built around this flexible concept,
which is closer to current trends in main stream software engineering.

The workshop aims at providing a picture of the current problems faced
by developers and users of toolsets, and future directions for the
development and use of NLP toolsets. We encourage reports of actual
experiences in the use of toolsets (complexity, training, learning
curve, cost, benefits, user profiles) as well as presentation of
toolsets concentrating on user issues (GUIs, methodologies, on-line
help, etc.) and application development. Demonstrations are also


Researchers and practitioners in Language Engineering, users and
developers of tools and toolsets.


Although individual tools (such as a POS taggers) have their use, they
typically need to be integrated in a complete application (e.g. an IR
system). Language Engineering issues in toolset and architectures
include (in no particular order):

 Practical experience in the use of a toolset;
 Methodological issues associated to the use of a toolset;
 Benefits and deficiencies of toolsets;
 User (linguist/programmer) training and support;
 Adaptation of a tool (or toolset) to a new kind of application;
 Adaptation of a tool to a new language;
 Integration of a tool in an application;
 Architectures and support software;
 Reuse of data resources vs. processing components;
 NLP algorithmic libraries.

Format of the Workshop

The one-day workshop will include twelve presentation periods which
will be divided into 20 minutes presentations followed by 10 minutes
reserved for exchanges. We encourage the authors to focus on the
salient points of their presentation and identify possible
controversial positions. There will be ample time set aside for
informal and panel discussions and audience participation. Please note
that workshop participants are required to register at .


 21 May 2000: Submission deadline.
 11 June 2000: Notification to authors.
 24 June 2000: Final camera-ready copy.
 5 August 2000: COLING-2000 Workshop.

Submission Format 

Send submissions of no more than 6 pages conforming to the COLING
format ( ) to 
We prefer electronic submissions using either PDF or Postscript. 
Final submissions can extend to 10 pages.

Organizing Committee 

 R�mi Zajac (Chair), CRL, New-Mexico State University, USA:
 Jan Amtrup, CRL, New-Mexico State University, USA:
 Stephan Busemann, DFKI, Saarbrucken:
 Hamish Cunningham, University of Sheffield:
 Guenther Goerz, IMMD VIII, University of Erlangen:
 Gertjan van Noord, University of Groningen:
 Fabio Pianesi, IRST, Trento:

Of Related Interest 

 The Natural Language Software Registry at 
 The Coling-200 Web Site at
Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

Message 2: Second Language Research Forum

Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 17:45:08 -0600
From: Christina M. Higgins <>
Subject: Second Language Research Forum

CALL FOR PAPERS: Second Language Research Forum 2000 

"Second Language Research: Past, Present, and Future"

Sept. 7-10, 2000 at the University of Wisconsin Madison


Plenary Speakers:

Ellen Bialystok, York University: "Against Isolationism: Cognitive
Perspectives on Second-Language Research"

Claire Kramsch, UC-Berkeley: "What Can Foreign Language Learning
Contribute to Second Language Research?" 

Lynn Eubank, University of North Texas: "Generative Research in L2
Acquisition: Some Whats, Where-Beens, and Whithers " 

Bonny Norton, University of British Columbia: "Non-Participation, Imagined
Communities, and the Language Classroom"

Invited Colloquia

"What is the End in End State Grammars? A Millennial Look at Ultimate
Attainment," organized by Chris Bongartz, UNC-Charlotte

"Language Attrition: Crosslinguistic Interplay and Sociolinguistic
Perspectives," organized by Dorit Kaufman, SUNY-Stony Brook

"Using Technology in Second Language Research: What Can it Offer?,"
organized by Sally Sieloff Magnan, UW-Madison

"Conversation Analysis: A Methodological Resource for SLA in the New
Millennium," organized by Numa Markee, UIUC

We invite papers on any aspect of second language research, including
1. Theories of SLA
2. Second Language Research Methodologies
3. Second Language Research and the Classroom
4. Interdisciplinary Approaches to Second Language Research

For a paper or poster submission, please visit our web site at:

Any inquiries should be sent to:
Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue