Editor for this issue: Lydia Grebenyova <lydia
linguistlist.org>
In a recent posting, David Beck notes that certain Central American languages differentiate between laryngealization in vowels and ejectives in fricatives as a counterexample to the generalization that laryngealization and ejectives are never distinctive (assuming that's what he means by "this last generalization;" his comment doesn't really relate to the very last generalization in the posting he was responding to--"Unlike ejectives, laryngealized consonants may be voiced"). His Totonac and Tepehua examples show no exception to the virtually universal generalization that ejectives are voiceless obstruents, and laryngealized/stiff/slack/creaky segments are sonorants or voiced obstruents. Even in languages where the linguistic transcription has written w', n', and l', alongside p', t', k', etc. (Lushootseed and Heiltsuk, for example), when one reads the phonetic descriptions of these phones it is clear that the sonorants are laryngealized or preglottalized and not ejective, while the voiceless obstruents are ejective and not laryngealized. John E. McLaughlin, Ph.D. Assistant Professor mclasuttMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuebrigham.net Program Director Utah State University On-Line Linguistics http://english.usu.edu/lingnet English Department 3200 Old Main Hill Utah State University Logan, UT 84322-3200 (435) 797-2738 (voice) (435) 797-3797 (fax)