Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen
linguistlist.org>
Apparently I disagree with everyone! I have no problem with the term "literary semantics". Semantics is a large field whose main focus is the study of meaning in language. That some people with a primary interest in literature might be interested in studying the "meaning of language" in the particular context of literary studies seems to me eminently plausible. The "meaning of language" in the poetry of e. e. cummings is obviously quite different from the "meaning of language" in the sonnets of Shakespeare. I heard recently an interesting talk on the poetry of Gertrude Stein focussing on what might be called the "non-meaning of language". Sculpture is also a large field whose focus is (I suppose) the creation and appreciation of three-dimensional objects. The material out of which such objects can be made is surely one of the fundamental dimensions in which these things can be seen. An article by John Updike in the latest New York Review pays particular attention to the different materials used by the late medieval sculptor Riemenscheider (alabaster, stone, pearwood...) and the effect they have on the final product. Are we not here precisely in the domain of "sculptural geology"? John Reighard D�partement de linguistique et de traduction Universit� de Montr�al CP 6128, Succ. Centre-ville Montr�al, Qu�bec H3C 3J7 Canada t�l : 514 343 6220 fax : 514 343 2284 e-mail: John.ReighardMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueumontreal.ca john.reighard
libertysurf.fr ZapReig
aol.com 245, rue d'Entraigues 37000 Tours France t�l : (0)2 47 76 08 64 [no '0' for international calls]