Editor for this issue: Terence Langendoen <terry
linguistlist.org>
Landau, Barbara, John Sabini, John Jonides, and Elissa Newport (eds.) (2000) Perception, Cognition and Language: Essays in Honor of Henry and Lila Gleitman. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, hardback, x+360 pp., ISBN: 0-262-12228-6. Zouhair Maalej, Faculty of Letters at Manouba, University of Manouba (Tunis) Book's purpose and contents: The idea for the book came from the 100th introductory psychology lecture course that Henry Gleitman taught in 1996. The book is a collection of papers written by colleagues and students to celebrate Henry and Lila Gleitman as two prominent contemporary psychologists and teachers. The collection includes 25 chapters distributed over three parts. The first part (the introduction) is written by the editors. The second part (5 chapters) is written by Henry Gleitman's colleagues while the third (19 chapters) is written by former students of the Gleitmans. Most of the essays are organised chronologically. Part I: Introduction The introduction presents a chronological evolution of the Gleitmans' career both singly and collaboratively, highlighting their contribution to research in linguistics (Lila on compound nouns), psychology (Henry on memory in goldfish), and psycholinguistics (Lila on children's acquisition of language and how caregiver speech helps them acquire language) with friends, students, and colleagues. The authors of the introduction round it up by mentioning the awards the Gleitmans were recipients to. Part II: Colleagues and Teachers Chapter 1 (Der Urgleit: Jacob Nachmias) Nachmias recounts briefly personal memories he remembers about Henry Gleitman as actor, singer, cook, and teacher. Chapter 2 (The Wordgleits: Paul Rozin) Rozin invoked his projects on memory in goldfish with Henry and on learning to read with Lila, and the effect Henry had not only on the author but also on his children, who under the influence of Henry's guidance took jobs in theatre and music. Henry is celebrated as an experimental psychologist (joint work with Jonides) and a cultured man. Chapter 3 (Multiple Mentorship: One Example of Henry Gleitman's Influence: Robert A. Rescorla) Rescorla stresses the influential nature of Henry's psychology seminars, which made him an experimental psychologist investigating delayed response learning in infant monkeys. The author devotes the second part of the chapter to talking about experiments he conducted with Colwill (1985) on instrumental learning among rats and the role that reward-giving has on learning. Chapter 4 (Some lessons from Henry and Lila Gleitman: John Sabini) Sabini highlights Henry as a teacher, where teaching for him meant targeting not a student elite (who hardly need a teacher), but those students who think that they have learnt all (while in reality they have absolutely learnt nothing) to make them "psychologically literate." Chapter 5 (Gleitology: The Birth of a New Science: Donald S. Lamm) Lamm dubbed Gleitology the psychology Henry Gleitman taught. As an editor and publisher, Lamm recounted his experience with Henry on publishing his lectures for Norton publishers. Part III: Perception, Cognition, and Language Chapter 6 (Children's Categorization of Objects: The Relevance of Behavior, Surface Appearance, and Insides: Elisabeth F. Shipley) Shipley criticises psychological essentialism, whereby a child is said to inductively infer the essential properties possessed by all members of a category, which constitute its very essence. It was found with children that shape is an important factor in assigning members within a category. Entrenchment, borrowed from Nelson Goodman, is used as an alternative in category assignment to psychological essentialism. Category entrenchment is enhanced by adults or observation, and children seem to categorise experience by behaviour rather than appearance. Chapter 7 (Mechanisms of Verbal Working Memory Revealed by Neuroimaging Studies: John Jonides) Jonides reports on how neuroimaging helps understand cognition by investigating working memory (WM), which manipulates stored information. WM is crucial in cognitive capacities such as problem solving, reasoning, categorisation, and language processing. A decline in working memory owing to ageing and brain pathologies has an important impact on such cognitive capacities. Jonides and colleagues have concerned themselves with two issues: (i) the architecture of verbal WM, and (ii) whether WM is a unitary or modular system. Adopting Baddeley (1986-1992) influential model for the architecture of verbal WM, Jonides reports that WM consists of three components: (i) a buffer (responsible for storage of verbal codes), (ii) a rehearsal mechanism (responsible for preventing decay or interference of information in the buffer by re- circulation), and (iii) a set of processing mechanism or central executive (responsible for manipulating information in the buffer). Neuroimaging has been used to ascertain the sub-components of WM. Work in neuropsychology and behavioural studies adduced to evidence the compartmentalisation of WM having been criticised, experiments in neuroimaging by Jonides and co-workers confirmed the thesis that WM works by subsystems specialised in different cognitive tasks. Differently located brain activation patterns relative to verbal and spatial information were observed. Chapter 8 (A Nativist's View of Learning: How to Combine the Gleitmans in a Theory of Language Acquisition: Elissa L. Newport) Newport integrates two claims made by two different schools of language acquisition by investigating respectively language learning and critical periods and creolization in natural sign language acquisition. To address the distributional view, Newport reports on an experiment on word segmentation, which innate knowledge cannot not explain. The results showed that both children and adults performed significantly well by segmenting strings of syllables relying on the distributional features of the corpus. Even infants were reported to have been more sensitive to words than non-words. Distributional features have been found to persist across modalities. Chapter 9 (Learning with or without a Helping Hand: Susan Goldin-Meadow) Bringing in evidence from the area of gestures to bear on language learning, Goldin-Meadow shows how one can learn a language without outside help, or indeed even invent a language to communicate with. In spite of some cross- linguistic data from Chinese pointing to the importance of mother-child interaction for learning, Goldin-Meadow proposes resilience of language both in the face of external and organic variation. Contrasting gesturing by speaking parents to their deaf children, Goldin-Meadow concludes that the difference lies in the fact that "gesture and speech in hearing individuals form a single integrated system -- the two modalities work together to convey the speaker's intended message" (p. 130). Speech- gesture mismatches are explained as an index to "readiness- to-learn" strategy. Chapter 10 (The Detachment Gain: The Advantage of Thinking Out Loud: Daniel Reisberg) Reisberg discusses the relation between thinking and speaking/signing, and whether this relation is mediated by any form of subvocalisation or what he prefers to term "externalization benefit" (140). Evidence pointing to the existence of such a phenomenon consists in loss of subvocalisation, which was demonstrated to be responsible for interference effects in producing words or phrases out of strings. However, as Reisberg himself points out, "we can sometimes create auditory representations without subvocalized support" (p. 142). Further down in the paper, Reisberg argues that "if a task is disrupted by concurrent articulation, this is not, in itself, to allow the conclusion that the task relies on subvocalisation" (p. 148). However, subvocalisation allows a "detachment gain" (p. 155) from one's mental products, which explains why we gain by writing down our ideas (before we forget them) or why we write our ideas and leave them for a while and come back to them. Chapter 11 (An Update on Gestalt Psychology: Philip J. Kellman) Kellman shows the relevance of Gestalt psychology to perceptual computations, in particular visual segmentation and grouping. Borrowing the idea of good continuation from Wertheimer, Kellman argues that object perception involves edge detection, edge classification, occluding edge, and boundary assignment (p. 165). Relatability ensures good continuation by stipulating the conditions required to connect two edges. Chapter 12 (Beyong Shipley, Smith, and Gleitman: Young Children's Comprehension of Bound Morphemes: Katherine Hirsh-Pasek) Hirsh-Pasek set up to study the role of bound morphemes in language comprehension. Building on Shipley, Smith, and Gleitman (1969), Hirsh-Pasek argues that "children may be sensitive to grammatical morphemes even when they are not yet producing them in their own speech" (p. 195) as evidenced in empirical research with toddlers. Working with bound morphemes, Hirsh-Pasek confirmed that toddlers (males and females) performed positively with -ing by looking at the right screen, whereas with non-grammatical and nonsense morphemes children were unanimous in paying little or no attention to the screen. What this study of the comprehension of bound morphemes among children is that children comprehend before they can produce. Chapter 13 (Language and Space: Barbara Landau) Landau investigates object recognition and naming by the child. Drawing on Quine, she argues that, like the sighted child, the blind child acquires the same names for objects with little or no tutoring at all thanks to similarities between objects (intuitive and theoretical). As an intuitive similarity, object shape as part of spatial representation features among the most important criterion in the early acquisition of names not just in experimental contexts but also in naturalistic ones. Chapter 14 (The Psychologist of Avon: Emotion in Elizabethan Psychology and the Plays of Shakespeare: W. Gerrod Parrott) As a way of paying tribute to Henry Gleitman the artist, Parrott surveys the psychology of emotions in Elizabethan drama and their perceptual correlates. To conclude, Parrott shows where modern psychology meets Renaissance folk psychology, and where it veers off the everyday track altogether. Chapter 15 (Manipulating the Input: Studies in Mental Verb Acquisition: Letitia R. Naigles) Naigles investigates the acquisition of mental state verbs (MSVs). MSVs are not ostensively perceivable, are polysemous, have a longer developmental trajectory (they function perceptually and conversationally among three-year olds before they start functioning modally), and provide clues to a theory of mind (i.e. when children can distinguish opinion from fact). The meanings of these MSVs are, thus, to be found in the syntax and context of use. Naigles proposes the age of four as the time when children make a transition in mental verb acquisition. Empirical evidence suggests that four-year olds did perform better on the factive-evaluative dimensions of MSVs after exposure to input material. Chapter 16 (Partial Sentence Structure as an Early Constraint on Language Acquisition: Cynthia Fisher) Fisher reviews the role of certain primitives of language in acquiring verb semantics. Some of these include sentence structure, syntactic bootstrapping (the fact of using "precursors of the same links between sentence structure and meaning, in concert with observations of world events to understand sentences," p. 277), presyntactic structural cues (nouns), conceptual structures. Noun identification is an important prerequisite for understanding verbs (p. 282). Chapter 17 (Perception of Persistence: Stability and Change: Thomas F. Shipley) Shipley is interested in identity and perception. Identity problems involve recognition and perceptual stability (as a function of change or motion), which might be inconsistent with internal representations in memory. Shipley concludes the paper by offering a motion-based model of stability he developed with Philip Kellman. Chapter 18 (Putting some Oberon into Cognitive Science: Michael Kelly) Extrapolating from Henry Gleitman's life as a mixture of science and art, Kelly investigates how cognitive principles impinge on creative language use, with special reference to Shakespeare's A Midsummer Night's Dream. Chapter 19 (The Organization and Use of the Lexicon for Language Comprehension: John C. Trueswell) Trueswell investigates garden-path structures as a paradigm case of the lexicogrammatical approach to language processing. The author reviews two approaches to the elucidation of garden-path structures: (i) using "lexically specific syntactic information" (Trueswell, Tanenhaus and Kello, 1993), and (ii) using "lexically specific semantic information" (Trueswell, Tanenhaus and Garnsey, 1994). Then, Trueswell set out to talk about an integrative "lexicalist" theory of sentence processing. The gist of this theory is that "word recognition includes the activation of rich lexical structures, including the parallel activation of lexically specific syntactic and semantic information" (p. 330). Critical evaluation: The five chapters included in Part II vary in length and quality. Only Rescorla's is academically classifiable. Quite understandably, since the occasion is the celebration of the Gleitmans by students, friends, and colleagues, the quality of the chapters was bound to be of the non-academic nature. Shipley's category entrenchment runs into problems. For one, the essential properties possessed by all members of a category may mean excluding members from being part of the category. Although flying is an essential property of being a bird, not all the members of the bird category possess it; an example in point is an ostrich. A better view of category membership is prototypicality as offered by Rosch (1973) and Lakoff (1987). Goldin-Meadow's assumption that "gesture and speech in hearing individuals form a single integrated system" is not unanimously accepted. In terms of the relation between speech and gesture, and whether both function as a unity or a duality, two different positions exist in the literature: (i) Unity of speech and gesture. Holders of this view are McNeill, Krauss & Hadar, Goldin-Meadow, Ekman, Stokoe & Marschark, Messing, and Cassell. McNeill calls the partnership of the two modalities "speech-gesture synchrony;" and duality of speech and gesture, which is defended by Feyereisen, Corina, and Emmorey (Maalej, forthcoming). Landau's argument that the blind child acquires the same names for objects with little or no tutoring at all has not been substantiated. If the sighted child does so more on the basis of the perception of object shape than on pragmatic function, it has not been made clear in the study how the blind child goes about recognising object shape in space. This is crucial, as Landau herself demonstrates (p. 225), in the case of adults' supplementing shape with other pragmatic criteria to name objects. In another paper, Landu reported on a series of experiments she did with Stecker (Landau & Stecker, 1990), where three-year old children (i) were capable of representing the figure object in a coarse way, ignoring shape completely, (ii) tended to ignore detailed shape, and concentrated on its principal axis, and (iii) adopted a richer perspective, where shape, objects parts, their spatial relationships, and their motion combine into a fine-grained account. Focus on shape in the present paper seems to be at odds with what she reported in Landau (1999). The closing word of this review has to py tribute to the wide-ranging quality of the papers in part III, which could have been thought as incoherent at first glance, but which at closer scrutiny shows the wide-ranging scholarship that the Gleitmans inculcated in their students and colleagues. References: Lakoff, George (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press. Landau, Barbara & D. Stecker (1990). "Objects and Places: Syntactic and Geometric Representations in Early Lexical Learning. Cognitive Development 5, 287-312. Landau, Barbara (1999). "Multiple Geometric Representations of Objects in Languages and Language Learners." In: Paul Bloom, Mary A. Peterson, Lynn Nadel & Merrill F. Garrett (eds.), _Language and Space_. Cambridge, Massachusetts/London, England: The MIT Press, 317-363. Maalej, Zouhair (forthcoming, Fall 2001). "Review of Messing, Lynn & Ruth Campbell (eds.) (1999). Gesture, Speech and Sign. Journal of Sign Language Studies. Messing, Lynn & Ruth Campbell (eds.) (1999). Gesture, Speech and Sign. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Biographical sketch Zouhair Maalej, Assistant professor of Linguistics, currently chair of the Department of English Language and Literature, Manouba (University of Manouba, Tunis). Research interests include cognitive linguistics, cognition-culture interface, pragmatics, (cognitive) stylistics, critical discourse analysis, systemic linguistics, translation studies. Publications include (machine) translation, voice, perception, and metaphor. Courses taught: (comparative) stylistics, pragmatics, advanced writing, translation studies (undergraduate) and pragmatics (postgraduate). I have written quite a few book reviews for LinguistList. I have recently (April 5-7, 2001) organised in Tunis the Fourth International Conference on Researching And Applying Metaphor under the theme of "Metaphor, Cognition, and Culture."Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue