Editor for this issue: Terence Langendoen <terry
linguistlist.org>
Ohta, Amy Snyder (2001) SLA Processes in the Classroom: Learning Japanese, ISBN 0-8058-3800-7 (cloth), 0-8058-3801-5 (paperback), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, xviii+298pp. Reviewed by: Guido Oebel, Faculty of Culture and Education, Saga (Japan) National University Synopsis in brief: According to the author, her book presents the first study to examine the private speech of adult learners participating in foreign language classes. The work is said to be her response to repeated calls for a somehow new kind of classroom research -- that speaks to the situated language development of "real" language learners. In order to accomplish this, the project was designed as longitudinal in nature, learner- centered in approach. Data collection focused on a group of individuals by using individual microphones to capture students' voices and thus their interactions over an entire academic year. The resulting longitudinal corpus provides examination not solely of processes occurring in a single class period but of the development of individuals over time. In her analysis the author made use of a socio-cognitive framework based on the theoretical work of the socio-historical school of psychology, particularly the work of Vygotsky and others inspired by his approach. Using this specific framework provides a starting point for understanding the processes occurring in the corpus, establishing a new perspective to the analysis of longitudinal classroom data. Synopsis in detail: Chapter 1: From social tool to cognitive resource: foreign language development as a process of dynamic internalization - provides an overview of the conceptual framework adopted for the analysis of the data. The chapter provides an accessible introduction for all different kinds of target groups such as researchers, teachers, or graduate students interested in L2 development. The author accomplishes her aim by setting out the useful key constructs for considering developmental discourse data including the concepts of functional systems, interactional routines, the zone of proximal development (ZPD), assisted performance, and the internalization processes evidenced through learner use of private speech, i.e. self-addressed speech. Furthermore the first chapter provides an overview of the setting and methodology of data collection as well as a description of the process of analysis. Chapter 2: Private speech: a window on classroom foreign language acquisition - provides a first discussion of the data so far collected -- with an intimate look into the mental processes of language learners -- an investigation of private speech and its role in foreign language development. From there the chapter moves to the investigation of how the learners involved use private speech in the corpus. The results provide an insight into the mental activity of learners focusing on their working out problems in L2 internalization and production respectively while interacting in the classroom environment. Surprisingly to a certain extent and somehow contradicting previous research, according to these results the individual learner turns out to be more active, even in situations where he/she may appear to be quite passive. Chapter 3: Peer interactive tasks and assisted performance in classroom language learning - considers the role of social interaction in language learning and how interaction in the ZPD leads to development. This chapter takes a step away from the individual into the interactive space created while learners are working with each other on language learning tasks. In this investigation of the role of peer interaction in classroom language learning, the concept of assisted performance is outlined by analyzing assistance from two different point of views: firstly, the ways learners assisting each other are examined, secondly, their own definition of assistance and its function is considered. The results of this examination show how learners act upon the various affordances within the classroom setting. Referring to interactional processes, it is of particular interest to see how peers with different abilities are able -- mainly through collaborative talk -- to accomplish what would have been impossible most likely without assistance. Interestingly even peers with less knowledge seem to be able to contribute helpful assistance to more proficient peers. Furthermore, the question of learner errors is raised, with the corpus examined in order to determine whether or not the "experimentees" involved pick up errors "performed" by their interlocutors. The relevance of collaboration in providing the building blocks to the individual's linguistic growth is considered through the evidence of how collaboration builds into learners' growing abilities to use the L2 resulting in confirming the importance of social cognition in learning. Particularly, the nature of working memory and selective attention underline the significance of collaborative processes allowing for an understanding of the effectiveness of assisted performance in promoting development. Chapter 4: A learner-centered analysis of corrective feedback as a resource in foreign language development - examines corrective feedback as a key element of interactive processes of language learners. Errors are examined from the learner's perspective, considering the variety of ways learners receive meaningful feedback in the classroom setting. Unlike the consideration of corrective feedback from a teacher-centered perspective in previous research literature, here it is defined from the learner-centered one. Ohta does not define the word corrective in its quality as teachers' means in attempt to correct, but what actually functions as corrective for the "experimentees" involved. By taking on various roles while participating in the language learning process classroom learners act as addressees interacting with their teachers, auditors who are pivy to the interaction of the teacher with others as well overhearers of the interactions of students within other groups during peer learning tasks. These roles interact with each setting and each learner's cognitive capacity enabling them more or less to utilize the corrective information available in the interactive setting. The results are an indicator for how learners take advantage of this corrective information, particularly recasts, both recasts directed to the learner and what Ohta herself terms "incidental recasts", i.e. utterances incidentally contrasting with a learner's own utterance during classroom interaction. These results provide new evidence of the effectiveness of recasts while broadening the conception of what constitutes corrective feedback from a learner's perspective. Chapter 5: The development of interactional style in the first-year classroom: learning to listen in Japanese - continues the focus on developmental processes being part of language learning. Specifically, this chapter presents a study of how first-year adult learners acquire facility with listener response expressions in the target-language Japanese. Japanese differs from English in the verbosity of listener response behaviour: e.g. listeners use to give frequent signals of attention and interest. The occurrence of listener responses in the corpus is examined considering the linguistic environment in which learners participate as well as the role of interactional routines in socializing interactional style. Eventually, the development of each single of the four first-year learners is scrutinized. Results show that the learners both develop increased proficiency with listener response expressions and that they follow a similar developmental sequence, moving from expressions of acknowledgment to the use of aligning expressions, thus based on the findings proposing a developmental sequence for acquisition of listener response expressions. Chapter 6: From task to activity: relating task design and implementation to language use in peer interaction - differs from the previous five chapters -- focusing on private speech, assisted performance, corrective feedback, the development of interactional competence -- stepping back from the data as a whole to ask about the relationship between task and activity -- between how assigned interactive tasks relate to what learners actually do in their peer learning setting. The use of English by these learners of Japanese is examined stressing the question how task design and individual differences impact the use of English while learning Japanese in the classroom setting. With attention to and interest in tasks as language learning tools a data-based understanding of how tasks are realized in learner discourse -- the discourse that forms the foundation for internalization of social interaction -- is vital to understanding how languages are learnt in the classroom. Critical evaluation: Ohta's study underscores the relationship between language learning tasks and peer activity realized as learners perform tasks even though each participant in the classroom enterprise has a vital role to play. However, the learners examined are still dependent on teachers to provide structuring and preparing for tasks in order for them to participate productively, especially, as - despite the idealizing of communicative tasks as the goal of instruction through current teaching methodology -- they still have a rather fragile grip on their L2 resources. The teacher's extent of preparing the learners for a particular task has a major impact on what transpires in peer interaction, i.e. language learning is not just about learner activity but the activity of teachers and their materials development as well. The analysis provided shows that beginners need a great deal of support by their teacher -- "who orchestrates the classroom learning situation" -- in order to be successful at peer learning tasks. Some of the support learners need comes from their peers, another considerable contribution is represented by task design and implementation, and last but by no means least support by teachers. This kind of support involves integrating tasks into lessons so that they logically flow from the instructional sequence. It undoubtedly does not suffice for a teacher to just tell beginning students how to do a task, or what grammatical form or vocabulary they should use, rather, Ohta characterizes productive peer interaction by a great deal of pre- task work. I myself deduce from the findings described in the study the demand for teachers increasingly involving their students in pre-task instruction so that they are furnished with more opportunities to use new vocabulary and forms prior to doing tasks and leading interactive demonstrations of tasks to be accomplished thus equipping learners better for performing more productively their L2 to accomplish the tasks. I hope Ohta's study may -- apart from her interesting findings regarding private speech and peer interactive tasks in the foreign language classroom -- contribute to a redefinition of teachers' roles as mediators and facilitators rather than providers of - unfortunately too often -- just unreflected input! References: Bellack, A.; Kliebrad, H.; Human, R.; and Smith, F. (1966) The language of the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press Doughty, C., and Williams, J. (eds.). (1998) Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. Goodwin, C. (1979) / Goodwin, M.H. (1987) Concurrent operations on talk: Notes on the interactive organization of assessments. IPRA Papers in Pragmatics, 1. McCafferty, S. G. (1992) The use of private speech by adult second language learners: A cross-cultural study. Modern Language Journal, 76. Rubin, K. H. (1979) The impact of the natural setting on private speech. In G. Zivin (ed.), The development of self-regulation through private speech. New York: Wiley. Saville-Troike, M. (1988) Private speech: Evidence for second language learning strategies during the 'silent' period. Child language, 15. Van Lier, L. (1988) The classroom and the language learner: Ethnography and second language classroom research. New York: Longman. Reviewer's Bio: Guido Oebel (PhD in linguistics) is a native German and currently employed as an associate professor for German as a Foreign Language (DaF) and FLL with Saga National University and as a visiting professor with Kurume University, both on the Southern island of Kyushu/Japan. His main areas of research are: comparative language studies (inter alia Indo-European -- Japanese), German dialects, sociolinguistics, bilinguism, and adult language education.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue