Editor for this issue: James Yuells <james
linguistlist.org>
Dear linguists,
I am looking for data (and references) on possessive
nominalizations, that is when a possessor form can be used
(in an argument position) without a possessum. Typical
examples are
1) Russian uses (former) possessive adjectives as proper
names. E.g.,
"Ivanovo" (name of a town) < "Ivanovo" 'Ivan's' (with
sg.neut.agreement);
"Borisov" (personal name) < "Borisov" 'Borisov's'
(sg.masc.agreement);
2) Lezgian uses a genitive formant together with a plural
marker to form the so-called "associative plural":
Dide-d-bur
mother-GEN-SBST.PL
'mother and those with her'
Note that here another morpheme is added to the genitive marker.
3) English form "John's" in an argument position usually
means 'John's home'.
(Of course, such a phenomenon is impossible in head-
marking languages.)
If you have an example of "possessive nominalization",
please point also what is the normal possessive
construction (including such data as possible word order,
agreement patterns etc.) and predicative possessive
construction ("This house is John's") in that language.
Thank you.
Best wishes,
Yura
******************************
Yura Lander
land_yu
pisem.net
Yury A. Lander
Dept. of Languages
Institute of Oriental Studies
Rozhdestvenka, 12
Moscow 103031
Russia
Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
I have a question regarding an example I heard that makes some strong claims about innate grammar abilities. There is a sentence about a boy who falls from a tree and bruises or breaks his arm. Later that evening in the bathtub, the boy's mother notices another break or bruise. The boy then makes a claim about when the injury occurred. I have heard this sentence and the claims that can be made from it by many different linguists. I don't remember the exact wording of the story and I remember the wording to be crucial to the story serving as an example. I would like to share this sentence/story (along with the names of the people who helped me to re-locate it) with my community college students. I have looked through my old text books and can not find it. << I did see a documentary where the great Noam Chomsky was discussing the example, so I imagine that the example is pretty popular.>> That last sentence follows along the lines of the example I am seeking. The difference being that in my sentence it is not clear why I think the example is popular <because of the person discussing it or because it was in a televised documentary.> and in the example I am seeking the reason is clear. Thank you for any information you can provide. I am hoping that in the cosmic scheme of things, something will come back to me. Yours in Linguistic Study, Paul - Paul Franckowiak Curriculum Writer Rio Salado Community College e-mail: paul.franckowiakMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueriomail.maricopa.edu Phone: (480) 517-8224 Fax: (480) 517-8229