Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen
linguistlist.org>
Dear linguists, English has sentences where VP is omitted: (1) John bought a car, but Bill didn't. (2) I don't know if John can solve the problem, but I'm sure he'll try to. I would like to know whether VP-ellipsis exists in VSO languages. Also, I would be grateful if anyone could tell me about articles/books on VP-ellipsis in those languages. Please reply to nnasuMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueessex.ac.uk Thanks in advance. Norio
Hello everyone, I'm currently writing a brief account of negation in contemporary French and I'm having trouble finding articles and/or books that aren't dated or that provide some original enlightenment. My claim would be, basically, that we need to abandon the idea of "ne" dropping to explain the different surface forms of negation. Instead, one could contend, for instance, that the basic negation is a simple, postponed one, and that one has to account for the appearance of "ne", not for its "deletion". It may lead nowhere, but perhaps it's an idea worth examining. I'll summarize. Thanks to everyone. Bruno Estigarribia Fioravanti Universite Paris V-Rene Descartes-Sorbonne Departement de Linguistique generale et appliquee brunildaMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueonline.fr