Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen
linguistlist.org>
I am interested in the diachronic origins of terms for 'yesterday' and 'tomorrow'. In Germanic, Slavic and Oceanic Austronesian languages, at least, we find terms for 'yesterday' derived from 'evening' (Slavic, Oceanic) and for 'tomorrow' from 'morning' (Germanic, Oceanic). I have three questions: 1) Is there a Slavonic specialist who can tell me how Russian /vchera/ 'evening' is related to /vecher/ 'evening'? I take it /vchera/ is a case-marked form of /vecher/, but I haven't managed to locate the details. 2) Are there similar developments in other language families? I assume there are, and I would be grateful for examples. 3) Has anyone written anything about these developments? Perhaps I have been looking in the wrong places, but almost everything I have found about the linguistics of time is either about aspect and tense (like Comrie's excellent works) or has a strong philosophical bias. The development of lexical items seems too mundane to command attention. Please reply to my e-mail address and I will summarise for the list whatever replies I receive. Thank you. Malcolm Ross - _____________________________________ Dr Malcolm D. Ross Senior Fellow Department of Linguistics Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies Australian National University CANBERRA ACT 0200Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Dear all, I am a PhD student at the school of Oriental and African Studies in London, UK and am looking for references on languages with so called syllabic consonants. Bell (1978) cites 85 languages with syllabic consonants but some of his original sources have been liberally interpreted for inclusion in this category and very few provide any sort of phonetic data (which is not surprising given the age of many of his sources). Therefore I am trying to update his database and would appreciate your input. Blevins (1995:220) provides a table on the parametric variation in syllabic segments, ranging from Kabardian, which only allows non high vowels as syllabic segments, to Imdlawn Tashlhiyt Berber which allows all types of segments, including fricatives and stops, to be syllabic segments. I would like to find more examples for inclusion in her table: Do you know of languages which allow for rhotic but not lateral or nasal sonorants as syllabic constituents (cf Sanskrit)? Or languages which allow for fricative syllabic consonants, but not stops (cf Dakelh/Carrier)?. I would be particularly interested to hear of a language where voicing plays a role in the potential of a segment to be syllabic: if we accept a general version of the sonority hierarchy (e.g. Katamba 1989:104), voiced segments are more sonorant than voiceless ones and thus one could conceive of a language which, for example, allows voiced fricative syllabic stops but not voiceless ones. Please send suggestions and references to me at: 109299Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuesoas.ac.uk If there is interest I will post a summary on the list. Many thanks, Zoe Toft Bell, A. (1978) Syllabic consonants. In Greenberg, J. (Ed.) Universals of Human Language. pp 153-201 Blevins, J. (1995) The Syllable in Phonological Theory. In Goldsmith, J. The Handbook of Phonological Theory. pp 206-244 Katamba, F. (1989) An Introduction to Phonology.