Editor for this issue: Marie Klopfenstein <marie
linguistlist.org>
Dear list members, on 25 September, I posted a query concerning the language of business women. I received quite a few helpful answers and would again like to thank the following people for their contributions: Peter Backhaus F. Engelman Tamara Faschingbauer S�ren Harder Jill Kealley Julie A. Lewis Meredith Marra Joyce Neu James Vanden Bosch Peter Backhaus and Julie A. Lewis informed me about the following article on the language of Japanese business women: Smith, Janet S. 1992. Women in charge: Politenss and directives in the speech of Japanese women. Language in Society, 21:59-82. F. Engelman pointed out the following general websites on women's studies: http://www.library.wisc.edu/libraries/WomensStudies/others.htm http://www-unix.umbc.edu/~korenman/wmst/links4.html http://www-unix.umbc.edu/~korenman/wmst/links_net.html http://www.winona.edu/womensstudies/default.htm S�ren Harder put me in touch with Mie Fem� Nielsen, who "has worked a lot on conversation analysis and business meetings etc. I remember her once talking extensively about male/female differences. Her homepage (in danish): http://www.femoe.dk , her email: femoeMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuehum.ku.dk ." Unfortunately, it turned out that she hasn't published her findings in English yet. If only I had picked up more Danish during childhood summer holidays ... Jill Kealley and James Vanden Bosch both recommended Deborah Tannen's website (http://www.georgetown.edu/tannen/) as a good starting point (which it obviously is). Meredith Marra made me aware of the Language in the Workplace Project at Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand, of which she is a part. Their website is located at http://www.vuw.ac.nz/lals/lwp/ and is a wonderful resource for anyone interested in workplace communication. The project was also pointed out to me by Tamara Faschingbauer. Dr. Joyce Neu drew my attention to two studies she had carried out on language in negotiations: "I did a study of negotiations that looked at male-female differences in negotiations -- the results did not follow the more known studies of male-female language in that there were very few differences. One explanation was that the women were not engaged in small talk or cocktail banter, but were speaking as professional women and so their language use didn't differ from men's in as many ways as other research would hvae predicted. That study was published quite a while ago -- Neu, J., Graham, J. L., & Gilly, M. C. (1988). The influence of gender on behaviors and outcomes in a retail buyer-seller negotiation simulation. Journal of Retailing, 64, 4: 427-451. A related article, a bit more recent, is: Neu, J. & Graham, J. L. (1995). An analysis of language use in negotiations: The role of context and content. In K. Ehlich and J. Wagner, eds., The discourse of business negotiation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. pgs. 243-272." All of the above information gave me a fairly good idea about what's been published on the subject. What's more, it showed that my research focus - metaphors used for the (self-)description of women managers - might indeed have something new to add (as is often the case with metaphor, actually). Thanks again and best regards, Veronika Koller Mag.a Veronika Koller Department of English/Business English Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration Augasse 9 A-1090 Vienna Tel.: 43/1/31336-4068 Fax: 43/1/31336-747