Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen
linguistlist.org>
It has been suggested to me that (non-stative) unnaccusative verbs cannot be used in imperative constructions. Does anyone have a view on whether this is so, and how it might be explained if it is? I have checked Levin's 'Verb of Change of State' (1993: 240-248), of which there are 368, and only very few of them appear to tolerate intransitive imperatives. One such imperative is shown in (1). (1) [to kettle:] Boil, you blighter! Is there a 'genuine' principle that blocks these imperatives or is it 'merely' a plausibility effect (eg use of the imperative implies the possibility of agentive control)? Replies please to: j.w.holmesMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue3f.co.uk [Levin, Beth. 1993. _English verb classes and alternations_. Chicago, UCP.] +++++++++++++++ Jasper W Holmes Analyst 3F Ltd POBox 245 DH1 3TT
I'm working on a book for baby boomer grandparents. I'd like to find someone who has knowledge of the word: grandmother. By that I mean, the historical perspection of the word, how grandmother is perceived in a social context, with younger people, etc. Given agism is rampant, is the word grandparent being percieved differently socially as baby boomers age and enter this new role? I would appreciate any input or help regarding this topic. Anything related to this particular word would be most helpful. I also wish to thank Ms. Speas for pointing out this site. Best, Nancy Duncan, MSWMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue