Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen
linguistlist.org>
Re: LINGUIST 12.2595 In addressing Ronald Sheen's first inquiry regarding Davies and Pearse's book, I have to admit that, indeed, these authors do not provide explicit empirical or comparative data supporting their approach to teaching English. After providing a review of the historical development of the various approaches to second language teaching, the authors do however, state that their theoretical framework falls under the communicative approach, but no mention is made to any theories on SLA. The same as with most reference books written for language teachers, Davies and Pearse's is a book whose suggestions are presumably based on the authors' experience in the classroom. It is briefly stated in the book that both authors have had wide teacher training experience in Mexico. Nonetheless, and despite what might seem a "pitfall", as an ESL learner and teacher myself, I believe that language teaching theories and recommendations based on one's teaching experience are certainly reliable. A language teacher who has taught for ten or more years would have enough experience to evidence what "seems to work" in the classroom. Yet, I appreciate Sheen's inquiry, as it made me realize the importance of specifying whether one's suggestions and approaches to language teaching are based solely on one's own teaching experience; this would avoid ambiguities like the that found in "Success in English Teaching". Even though, and as stated by Sheen, the suggestions offered in Davies and Pearse might seem obvious or based on "the flimsiest of evidence", I do not have evidence to support such a statement about the book in question.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue