Editor for this issue: Terence Langendoen <terry
linguistlist.org>
Singleton, David (2000) Language and the Lexicon: An Introduction. Arnold Publishers, hardback ISBN 0-340-73173-7, xii+244pp. Pritha Chandra, Centre of Linguistics and English, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi (India). This book is an introduction to the various aspects of lexicology and its relevance for the other sub-fields of linguistics such as morphology, syntax and semantics. It also provides an elaborate account of other factors such as language variations, language development theories and language pedagogy, which essentially have a massive impact on studies of the lexicon. The book is ideally suited for new students to the discipline, with detailed 'suggestions for further reading' and 'focussing questions/topics for discussions' provided at the end of every chapter. The style is lucid and the text is full of examples making the task of learning easier for the freshers to the field. Nevertheless, its relevance as an all time reference for the fundamental issues in linguistics and lexicology cannot be in any way undermined. The chapters are methodically arranged, beginning with the basic definitions and introduction to the concept 'word' itself while finally proceeding to evaluate its relationship with the other aspects of language. The first chapter introduces the terms lexicon, lexis and lexicology, and comments on some of the ancient theories that considered speech to be analogous to the word. The possible definitions of a word, in terms of its phonetic, phonological, semantic, syntactic and orthographic forms have been discussed quite extensively, while the limitations of each approach have been consistently provided alongside the description. However, the bias towards the grammatical approach, which uses the criteria of 'possible mobility' and 'internal stability' to define the word is quite well pronounced. The second chapter tries to evaluate the status accorded to the lexicon as a structure building system. Variant syntactic theories, such as the Valency Grammar, Lexical Functional Grammar, Chomskyan Grammar etc are studied in an attempt to examine the extent to which lexical items determine the forms and meanings of utterances. The domain of the lexicon is revisited in the third chapter with efforts to understand the internal structure of words with discussions ranging over a wide range of concepts such as the morpheme, the differences between free and bound morphemes, inflectional and derivational morphemes and some of the word formation processes such as compounding. Words do not combine with each other randomly; rather, there seems to be a systematic approach to the patterns and possible range of combinations or collocations that specific words are allowed in different languages. This fact has often been taken into consideration in traditional dictionary making procedures, and also shapes the electronic corpus building processes of the present times. The fourth chapter looks at the issue of collocations again, while suggesting that a large part of our language performance relies on word combinations that function as "prefabricated chunks", that also provides ground for the assumption that the definition of lexical units can be extended to semantically transparent multi-word expressions. This idea is carried on to the next chapter, which focuses on the variant approaches to the meanings of lexical items, such as the referential/denotational account, lexical field theory and some cognitive approaches. The chapter concludes with the note that context plays a pivotal role in the functioning of the lexicon. The sixth chapter looks at the possible ways in which choice of lexical items determine the phonological forms (as for instance, the position of the stress determined by the part of speech in some languages such as English) as well as orthographic forms of a language. The text provides a detailed account of the various kinds of orthography that have evolved to suit language particular characteristics. Evidence is also provided to support the idea that both phonology and orthographic realisations are to a large extent, determined by grammatical and semantic information available in the language. The seventh chapter deals with language variation, in terms of geographical, socio-cultural, ethnic and gender related factors. The interaction between lexical units and human perception and thought processes is also studied, especially in the light of some of the well-known theories such as that propagated by Humboldt and the Safir-Whorf hypothesis. It is argued that though there is an inevitable relation between language and human thought processes, a language deterministic position is best avoided. The eighth chapter discusses the core methodologies of a diachronic study of languages, namely the Comparative Method and the Internal Reconstruction Method. The focus is however on the changes that have occurred in the lexical forms and meanings and their distribution, and the factors influencing these changes, such as social status, cross- linguistic influence, omission of euphemisms and creation of new terms for new concepts and things. The ninth chapter looks at the acquisition of lexical items, starting from the one-word stage to the multi-word stage and the possible role of the environment and motherese in the language acquisition process. The rest of the chapter discusses the organisation and operation of the lexicon, with reference to some approaches such as the Logogen Model, Cohort Model, the Modularity Hypothesis and Connectionism. Differences between first language and second language acquisition have also been highlighted in a further attempt to understand the internal structuring of the lexicon. The final chapter traces the development of lexicology, with illustrations from different varieties of glossaries and dictionaries belonging to different periods. Special reference is made to two of the most popular dictionaries of the present times, namely 'A New English Dictionary on Historical Principle' (1884-1928), now popularly known as the Oxford English Dictionary and the 'American Dictionary of the English Language' (1860), prepared by Noah Webster. Also cited are the names and characteristics of a few of the most advanced attempts at dictionary making, utilising the new breakthroughs in information technology, such as the COBUILD project (Collins Birmingham University International Language Database), and various dictionaries on CD-ROM and the internet. The final part of the chapter looks at the pedagogical techniques adopted for teaching lexis in the classrooms and evaluates the success of three most commonly used methods, namely the grammar-translation method, audio-lingual method and the communicative approach. One of the prevalent ideas evident throughout the book is the relevance of a study of lexical items to language and language pedagogy, thus serving the purpose that the author had set out with, to show that "everything in language is related in some way or other to words". However, though every chapter has mainly focussed on various approaches to the study of the lexicon and the lexis, the author has been careful in ruling out a lexical determinist approach and maintaining that "...conversely, the lexical dimension of language needs to be conceived of as rather more than just a list of lexical items". In some works of generative literature, the lexicon is conceptualised as a storehouse of information of lexical items and could be considered at par with a dictionary or an encyclopaedia (for further information, refer to Speas, 1990). The role of the lexicon extends to more than just providing the raw materials needed for further syntactic processes to take place. Each lexical entry is accompanied by explicitly described semantic peculiarities and conceptual/schematic structures, which as a matter of fact, do not greatly influence the structural representation into which the item enters. This redundancy has been eliminated in current minimalist inquiries, where the lexicon contains that minimal amount of information that is required for further syntactic processes to occur. The lexicon is viewed as a list of lexical items assembled by a computational process. It is argued that there exists a universal set of features, from which a particular language chooses a subset. The features of the subset are assembled into lexical items of the language, while the rest of the set are barred from entering into the computation once the choice has been made (Chomsky 1998, 1999, 2000). The features with which the lexemes are construed essentially are those that are legible at the interface levels, Logical Form (LF) and Phonetic Form (PF), and consequently by other faculties of the mind. Based on the conditions imposed by the legibility conditions, features are divided into three types (A)-(C). (A) Phonetic features, interpreted at the phonetic level, (B) Semantic features, interpreted at the semantic level, (C) Features that are not interpretable at either interface. The set of features in (A) and (B) are interpreted at PF and LF respectively, while those in (C) are those that are accessible in the course of the narrow syntactic derivation. It is difficult to ascertain whether the features or the properties of the 'words' in the lexicon also belong to the 'concepts' to which they correspond. "One might ask whether these properties [phonetic and semantic] are part of the meaning of the word ... or the concept associated with the word" (Chomsky 1997: 5-6). The answer to this question is not available yet; nonetheless one could perhaps conceptualise a relation between the lexical items and the 'concepts' or the words used in actual performance. Lexical items are 'elementary' words, which are rather rudiments of the 'performed' words uttered in the actual speech in all its discursive richness. The former necessarily are special forms of the 'performed' words used for the derivation of expressions in the language faculty, readable by other interacting mental faculties. The nature of the mechanism of composition of the semantic features in (B) is however not very clear. Moreover, questions like the extent to which the idiosyncratic semantic and phonological features of the items enter into the computational procedure, and how the expressions created out of the lexical items composed solely of features are accessed by other faculties, to be finally associated with concepts can have appropriate answers only through further extensive research. In this regard, Singleton's work, while taking lexicon as the central theme, introduces to the 'fresh' mind all the intricate debates, including the compelling arguments of the generative zone, engrossing the linguistic research today. It is a commendable and recommendable work for all those who desire to experience the expanse of the linguistic field. Chomsky, N. 1997. Language and Mind: Current Thoughts on Ancient Problems. Pesquisa Ling��stica 3(4). Chomsky, N. 1998. Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Chomsky, N. 1999. Derivation by Phase. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Chomsky, N. 2000. Beyond Explanatory Adequacy (ms.). Speas, M. 1990. Phrase Structure in Natural Language. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Pritha Chandra received the MPhil degree in Linguistics from the Centre of Linguistics and English, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi (India) in 2001 and is currently enrolled in the PhD Programme in the same university. She has been teaching linguistics in a college in the University of Delhi. Her research interests revolve around generative syntax and semantics, with a specific focus on argument structure, case and the Extended Projection Principle (EPP). In her MPhil work, she has analysed the semantic and structural peculiarities of dative subjects in Hindi. She is presently examining the theory of empty categories, in light of the recent development in generative syntax.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue