Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen
linguistlist.org>
We are trying to put together an undergraduate course on the linguist as detective. We want to use the terminology of detective stories to describe ways in which various linguistic phenomena can be accounted for. Any tips gratefully received. I will post a summary of responses to the list. Thanks in advance. Debra Aarons Department of Linguistics University of Stellenbosch South AfricaMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
During a discussion yesterday regarding the opposed positions of Locke and Leibniz on the status and role of the principle of non-contradiction, one of my students asked whether contemporary linguists had done research on the issue. She was particularly interested in Leibniz' claim that, whether or not a person held an explicit, formal version of the principle, their linguistic behavior would in fact exhibit their obeying it. This raises the associated issue of the so-called "laws of thought" in general: does linguistic behavior generally occur in such ways as to allow one to infer that the speaker is (perhaps even only roughly) the principles of non-contradiction, identity and excluded middle? If there is some research done on these topics, I'd appreciate its being pointed out to me. I'll summarize what I find out for the list. tnx! George Gale Philosophy/Univ. of Missouri-Kansas CityMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue