Editor for this issue: Jody Huellmantel <jody
linguistlist.org>
ICHL 2001 XVth International Conference on Historical Linguistics 2nd circular The XVth International Conference on Historical Linguistics will be held in Melbourne, August 13-17, 2001. The Department of Linguistics at La Trobe University will host the conference, and it will be held at the Hotel Ibis, 15 Therry St, Melbourne. The purpose of this circular is to notify people of the workshop proposals. The deadline for abstracts for papers (20 mins) for the main body of the conference is Easter 2001 (by whatever calendar), but if you require earlier acceptance, you can send your abstract at any time and we will review it within a few days. Abstracts (of no more than 250 words) should be submitted in the body of an email message to B.BlakeMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuelatrobe.edu.au >For further information, see our website http://www.latrobe.edu.au/www/linguistics/conferences.html WORKSHOPS Three workshop proposals have been received and are reproduced below, and in an attachment. Intending participants are asked to contact workshop organisers directly. 1. Workshop on Linguistic Stratigraphy and Prehistory The organizers are Henning Andersen (Baltic and Slavic) and Christopher Ehret (African languages). For information, contact Henning Andersen // Slavic Department, UCLA // P.O.Box 951502 // Los Angeles CA 90095-1502 // U.S.A. Email address: andersen
humnet.ucla.edu Every linguistic tradition includes layers of material that entered it at different times in the more or less distant past. Hence, for periods preceding our earliest historical documentation, linguistic stratigraphy may yield evidence that can complement the archaeological record where there is one, but can be eloquent in and of itself where there is none.. The chronological layering of the lexical and grammatical material of a language may reflect the prehistory of its speakers in several ways. For instance, layers of word formation or borrowing may bear witness to stages in technological development or to changing currents in spiritual culture; irregular phonological reflexes may be evidence of the convergence of diverse dialects in the formation of a tradition of speaking; layers of material from different source languages may form a record of changing cultural contacts in the past; in some instances, layers of material from a single source language spanning a lengthy period of time shed light on the prehistoric development of both the target language and the source language. The stratigraphic evidence may be sufficiently determinate to suggest the nature of the contact in individual prehistoric episodes of language contact, indicating whether it was indirect or direct, ephemeral or long-lasting, a borrowing relationship or a case of language shift. Lexical and grammatical elements may carry different weight in the evaluation of prehistoric episodes of language contact, as may also appellatives and propria, and among propria, hydronyms, toponyms, and anthroponyms. The aim of the proposed workshop is to highlight this important area of historical linguistics and to bring together linguists working with diverse geographical and cultural areas for the discussion of recent advances and work in progress as well as problems of method and issues of interpretation. 2. Workshop on reconstruction and subgrouping in Australian languages Organisers: Claire Bowern and Harold Koch It would be helpful to us if you could let us know if you would like to participate, by emailing us at bowern
fas.harvard.edu or harold.koch
anu.edu.au, as soon as possible, but no later than **31st January 2001**. Please also include the subgroup/languges you will be presenting evidence for or against, and your contact details. We would also like a brief abstract by **1st April, 2001**. Please also note the deadline for submission of papers for pre-circulation: **30th June 2001**. Dear colleagues, We are organising a workshop on subgrouping and reconstruction in Australian languages, to be held during the 15th International Conference on Historical Linguistics at La Trobe University, Melbourne, from 13th - 17th August, 2001. (For conference details see http://www.latrobe.edu.au/www/linguistics/conferences.html ) Briefly, the aim of the workshop is to examine currently accepted Australian subgroupings from as many parts of the country as is possible, to see if the groupings are likely to be genetic (that is, the similarities between the languages are the result innovation during a period of common envolution) or whether they more likely reflect a local linguistic area. Such a workshop will make publicly available the evidence that supports each subgroup. Most of the subgroups/families presupposed for Australia date to lexico-statistical groupings done in the late 1960s (such as O'Grady, Wurm and Hale's 1965 classification); we would like to use the occasion of a major historical linguistics conference in Australia to examine these proposed subgrouping in detail. By the end of the workshop we hope to have assembled a collection of papers which examine these subgrouping proposals from the point of view of traditional historical linguistics - that is, through reconstruction, detailed etymology and the separation of common innovation from borrowing. We hope this will move comparative linguistics in Australia towards demonstrating to what extent it is possible to justify genetic subgrouping and the use of the comparative method. A number of scholars have raised doubts as to the application of these methods in Australia, and we would like to use this opportunity to see to what extent their doubts are justified. As you have no doubt guessed by now, we would like to invite you to participate in this workshop! Specifically, we are inviting you to write paper and give a short presentation outlining the historical/comparative evidence for the subgroup(s) which you mostly work on. Please find below a set of guidelines for participants, which include some suggestions for evidence to consider and a list of possibly helpful references. Draft guidelines for participants Aim: To present the evidence which supports a given subgroup; that is, evidence which supports both a) the coherence of the languages in a single group (establishing the "group" of subgroup), and b) the distinctiveness of the group from the remainder of Australian languages (establishing the "sub" of subgroup). To be diagnostic of a genetic subgroup in the traditional sense this evidence must further be established to have been a feature of the protolanguage ancestral the languages of the group, and not: a) the result of inheritance from a more distant ancestor, or b) the result of diffusion after the dissolution of pSG (proto Subgroup). (In practice it may not be possible at this stage to decide what features of a proto-language are the result of innovation. When in doubt, it is better to present the complete evidence for pSG and leave till later a determination of its status as retention from pre-pSG, SG innovation, or perhaps even a post-pSG innovation.) Languages: � What languages are included in the subgroup? Mention doubtful or borderline cases too. � Where are they located? (Provide a rough map.) Lexical evidence: Indicate the words which you consider to be unique to the SG. � Give the reconstructed form and meaning of each. � Organise the vocabulary by part of speech (especially Noun and Verb) and semantic domain (of nouns: kinship, artefact, flora, etc.) (Perhaps make reference to the lists of "basic vocabulary" (Swadesh, Klokeid-O'Grady, Menning-Nash) [we can supply relevant references] Evidence from word-formation: Indicate any word-formation devices (derivational affixes, reduplications, vowel or consonant alternations) that are distinctive of SG and reconstructable to pSG. Semantic evidence: Mention distinctive semantic developments that might have affected words of more wide-spread distribution. (e.g. "Word X of meaning M elsewhere in Australian has shifted in this SG to meaning N.") Phonological evidence: � Indicate distinctive phonemes of SG that are reconstructable to Proto-SG. � Indicate distinctive phonotactic patterns of SG that are reconstructable to Proto-SG. � Give the phonological changes which differentiated this SG from other related languages (including the changes which led to the distinctive phonemes and phonotactic patterns of pSG.) Note: We are not interested in SG-internal phonological changes which merely differentiated some languages of SG from other languages of the same SG. Morphosyntactic evidence: � Indicate any distinctive characteristics of the morphosyntax that result from common innovations; e.g. auxiliaries, pronominal clitics. Pronouns: � Give the stems and inflectional forms that are reconstructable to pSG, especially any that reflect innovations of the SG. � Give the interrogative-indefinite stems reconstructable to pSG. � Give the demonstrative stems reconstructable to pSG. Nominal inflection: � Give the distinctive case, number, class markers reconstructable to pSG. If there are conditioned allomorphs, indicate the reconstructed conditioning factors. Verb inflection: � Give the forms according to their inflectional classes, in paradigms. � Also indicate the membership of (especially small) inflectional classes in terms of the reconstructed lexemes. 3. MEDIA AND LANGUAGE CHANGE Prospective participants are asked to submit a 1-2 page abstract by APRIL 15, 2001, to Susan Herring (herring
indiana.edu). Early abstract submission is encouraged. The abstract should be sent as a regular e-mail message (not as an attachment). Alternatively, abstracts may be sent by regular mail to: Susan Herring Library 011 Indiana University Bloomington, IN 47405 USA Participants will be expected to submit a full version of their paper by JUNE 15, 2001. How do communication media -- ranging from writing to print to radio and television to the Internet -- affect the structure and use of human language over time? How does the increasing availability of historical records of speech, e.g. via wax cylinders, film, tape recording, videotape, and computer, potentially change the methods, assumptions, and findings of historical linguistics? These questions constitute the dual focus of this workshop. Technologically-mediated communication will be addressed as a facilitator or inhibitor of language change, as a site for the emergence and evolution of genres and linguistic norms, as a vehicle for the diffusion of linguistic innovation, and as socially and ideologically constructed over time. Papers may include diachronic studies of language in a particular medium, synchronic studies of language in a new medium in comparison with a pre-existing medium, and considerations of the methodological implications of new media for investigating language change in real or recent time. A related methodological issue is how new media enable researchers to construct and analyze linguistic corpora, or constitute corpora in and of themselves, as is the case for the Internet and the World Wide Web. Barry Blake Conference Organiser Kate Burridge Associate Professor, Linguistics La Trobe University Bundoora, 3083 Vic
FIRST CALL FOR PAPERS The American Dialect Society is now accepting proposals for papers to be delivered at its annual conjoint meeting with the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association. The Convention will be held in Vancouver, BC Canada and will run from October 11 - 13, 2001. Papers dealing with any aspect of the dialects of English or other languages spoken in the United States will be considered and those dealing with Canadian dialects, language contact in Canada, and dialect contact along the US/Canada border are especially welcome. Please send a 150 word abstract by regular mail or e-mail to the address listed below no later than March 15, 2001. Glenn A. Martinez Department of Modern Languages The University of Texas at Brownsville 80 Fort Brown Brownsville, TX 78520 gamartinez1Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueutb1.utb.edu