Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen
linguistlist.org>
Hi all! As I half expected, I received messages from students who preferred to be discreet on this the subject. They were all in agreement with my posting. Their attitude is quite understandable and I think that, careerwise, it would have been wiser for me to do the same. Especially after reading Jim Fidelholtz's comments on older candidates (I'm 37)... I would like to encourage students to express their opinion on the List, but I would be glad to post anonymously messages that are sent to me directly if the author thinks it unwise to do so publicly. I wish to reproduce a message I got from one student. I will, at this student's request, modify the message in order to avoid identification of both the student and the university this student works as a lecturer. I will try to make these changes without any indication. I know this is not usual, but I don't think the author will mind. - ----------------------- Hi Alain, I'm a Ph.D. student. I read your posting on Linguist List and thought I'd respond privately. I read the posting you are referring to and was quite offended I agree wholeheartedly that universities, and my experience is only directly with linguistics departments but I've heard stories from my peers in other departments as well, especially English, are trying to have their cake and eat it too. I shook my head when this lecturer position posting included the Ph.D. requirement. I've been teaching sessionally since September, my contract ends in April, and I've been doing it without a completed Ph.D. I've been teaching introductory, second year and graduate classes. In the grad class I've had to 'supervise' students, though not with their theses but really, how much different is it to direct a student in a term paper than it is a thesis, especially at the MA level which is what my students are. At least when I here I knew they were advertising for a tenure track phonology position but of course there was no guarantee that I'd have an advantage over anyone else applying for the job. In the end I decided not to apply for the job since I've decided, at least for now, not to pursue an academic career. And at the University where I work, they at least make provisions for long term sessional instructors. They don't get 'tenure' but they do get permanent positions if they've been there long enough, but they don't get the same pay or benefits as tenure track faculty. I don't know if these permanent sessionals are expected to supervise graduate students or not or what kind of research they're expected to do though I know that these sessional still present papers at conferences. Anyway, I just wanted to let you know that I agree with your email and I'm becoming more and more disgusted and disillusioned by the academic environment. I know that in Canada universities face a lot of financial cut backs but it seems that our universities are willing to accept these cuts and then pass them on to younger employees by way of not offering them permanent, tenure-track positions. I, for one, have no desire to get my Ph.D. and then be treated as a second class academic among my peers, moving from job to job, picking up the cost of moving and going through the same resettling process over and over again. I'm glad you took the time to send your email to everyone on the list. I think it needs to be said. I don't mind if you express my sentiments if you make another posting but I'd appreciate it if you'd keep my name and affiliations confidential. Thanks Student - ----------------------- I was quite saddened by this message. Is the disillusion of this student shared by others? I know that I never thought of it this way, but these comments give food for thoughts. I would like to comment on the posted messages. Patrick-Andre Mather gives a good overview of the situation in Quebec. I was quite shocked to read of the working conditions of lecturers in the richest university in Quebec and one of the richest in Canada. I might add that, until the recent work conflicts between some universities of the Universite de Quebec network and their lecturers, there weren't any (or very few) lecturer positions in Quebec. lecturers had to apply on individual courses and had individual contracts for each course they were to give. For instance, a lecturer might teach 3 classes on term and none the following term. Are their similar situations outside Quebec? Lynne Murphy points out that "in English speaking countries outside North America, "Lecturer" is the rough equivalent of "Assistant Professor"--i.e., it is a tenurable position..." I know that in France, there is a position called Maitre de conference that seem to be very similar to the situation described by Lynne. Plus, doctorate students are often given paid teaching jobs at the undergraduate level. I would like to finish this with Jim Fidelholtz comments. He writes Re the relation between research and teaching:: This comment, however, I consider to be seriously misguided, although quite widespread in the acceptance of its (for me, false) premises. Specifically, I believe, based on personal experience and perhaps some general theoretical suppositions, that it is not possible, either for a teacher to be as good as they could be without doing research, or for a researcher to do the best research they could do without also doing some teaching. That is, teaching, especially if it is imparting one's research results, leads to a certain give-and-take in the classroom which can only be revealing for that research. On the other hand, doing research opens avenues of explanation for the teacher, as well as tending to make them current in both methodological and theoretical aspects of the field. I can only but agree with him and I have to confess that my remarks on the subject were quite clumsy. He also makes a point in his "attack" on the separation of teaching and research. I have often heard professors complaining on having to teach at undergraduate levels because they could not put as much time on their "proper research". I have also known (older) professors complaining on the production obligation, saying that they preferred to teach (these were the best professors I had when I was an undergraduate). Since they considered that they had to be up to date in order to give a good "floor show", they did continue their research at their own pace without felling pressured to produce. I don't think this is the right attitude either. There have to be contacts between scholars, but, as I said, they were older professors who didn't have anything to prove. Cheers! Alain Theriault Ph.D. Student (Linguistics) Universite de Montreal Research Fellow Concordia UniversityMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
I'm glad everyone knows except me what "lecturer" means in a US context. :=) In France we have Professeur - the most senior, a tenured position, a category you join by passing before a national committee who judge your research. Maitre de conf�rences - a tenured position you get by being approved by the national committee who judge your research and by a Univeristy recruitment committee. PRAG - teaching and not research posts which are secure posts, involve twice as much teaching as a maitre de conf�rences (PRAGs teach around 14 hours a week). These posts are open to people who have passed the national - very difficult- competitive exam to become High school teachers. There are more and more of these posts - often maitres de conf�rences who retire are replaced by these. Various one year teaching and research posts, normally only renewable once, which are meant to be for people on their way to tenure. Huge numbers of temporary lecturers -"vacataires", who are paid by the hour, do not have tenure, and must have a "principal employer" outside the university system. These are often filled by doctoral students, high scool teachers, and people who have a job in the private sector (scientists, managers, management trainers). John Mullen Universit� de Paris 12Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue