Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen
linguistlist.org>
Re:12.890, Disc: The Role of Lecturers in Universities Here in Estonia, the titles would be 'Herra Profetsor Doktor' or 'Lektor.' There is, however, another question--one of reality. Those among our students who might end up in our shoes need to know what they're in for should they fall through the cracks and end up in akadeemia. Therefore, the 6th word in the following quote, 'than,' might best be replaced with 'of the.' "We owe our students more than petty squabbles over titular preferences and antiquated distinctions that only serve to divide our faculties and undermine our pedagogical effectiveness." -- Sean M. Witty <wittysanMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issueHotmail.com> Mark L. Chamberlin malichii
mail.com Tartu University
I would like to respond to Sean M. Witty's comments. I think the distinction made by Anthea was needed. It helped to clarify the subject of this discussion. The discussion was first intended as a protest to the trend in North American universities (and elsewhere such as Denmark or the Netherlands) of hirering part time lecturers without any (or with very little) insentive to do research. The following comments are made with this precision in mind. As James Fidelholtz noted, there is a continuum between teaching and reasearch that should be there but that the present tendency of super-specialisation is eroding. Therefore, I think that James comments were somewhat surprising. James wrote : > If you're a professor, thank the >lecturers for teaching all those classes that you would have to teach >otherwise. If you're a lecturer, thank the professors for doing all that >research you would have to conduct otherwise. The idea of getting a Ph.D. , especially after all the years it takes to achieve this, is not to have others do the research which you might want to conduct. You don't go through all this treaning as a researcher in order to have someone else to do it. I agree with James that a Ph.D. is somewhat unnecessary to teach someone to say "pass me the salt". If you are a Doctor in Philosophy, it is because you have an interest in thinking and analysing data. But I have to strongly dissagree with him when he says that lecturers should be thankfull that others take the burden of this so ungreatfull thing that reasearch is. Why should lecturers be gratefull that, with the same training as a professor, he/she gets to do half the job he/she was trained for, for a fraction of the pay. Does this mean that universities consider that the teaching part of a professor's work load is not worth as much as the research part? And yet, the announcement that triggered this discussion (it was from a Norh American university) asked for someone with tenure-track qualifications for teaching 5 classes, both at undergraduate and levels, on a temporary basis (8 months). This is very attractive since summer period is not remunerated... Why should a lecturer be gratefull that someone else is doing his/her job? Professors should indeed (and the ones I know are!) be gratefull that lecturers are there, allowing them to do their research! Universities should also be gratefull that these lecturers allow them to give student a better and more diversed training! This "tittle war" james talks about has the consequence that students think (I was one of them when I started my undergraduate studies) that classes given by lecturers were second grade from the ones given by tenures. And by treating lecturers as simple service providers that could be replaced at will, taking advantage of the offer to lower the price of these services, does not improve this impression. With a 5 class workload, especially for classses often given for the first time, which means 3 to 4 hours of preparation for each hour in class, I don't where this research experience will be usefull. With such a workload, these summer months are necessary to to conduct one's research. So the lecturer has to do his/her research while washing dishes in a restaurant (or any other odd job) in order to make ends meet. I think it is quite clear, under this situation, that the university offering this post had no intention of supporting the research the candidate might want to conduct (but wold probably gladly see it's name under the lecturer's name in any communication or paper!). Plus, if I compare the teaching load of a professor at the linguistics department of Universite de Montreal, the teaching load is heavier for the lecturer that will fill this position (though I have to admit that I don't know what the teaching load is for professors at this specific university). A professor has a 4 class teaching workload (both at undergraduate and graduate levels) over 3 semesters although most of them give their classes over the Fall and Winter terms. In the announced position, the lecturer has a teaching load of 5 classes over 2 semesters for, again, a fraction of the price (especially that the cost of living in the town where this university is has a reputation of being somewhat high!). The blessed chosen candidate usually has to relocate him/herself at his/her cost (relocation is usually partly, if not totally covered for new tenures!), and that for a temporary time since these positions are not necessarely renewed! I would like to see the point of view tenures and department administrators on this. I realise that my point of view is somewhat "biaise" and interested. Alain Th�riault Ph.D. Student (Linguistics) Universit� de Montr�alMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
Just wanted to chip in my two cents regarding the situation for "lecturers" (or adjunct faculty, or 'part-time' teachers) which in my definition means highly-educated, experienced teacher/researchers who are hired into jobs on a per-class basis, with no long-term contracts, no benefits, and often no 'official' office or phone or computer. These jobs are more and more common at the university level in the U.S. (and in Canada, too, it appears), and indeed, are often replacing tenure-track positions. The justification is not so much 'cost-efficiency' as pure bottom-lining on the part of universities (why pay more for teachers when you can pay less?), and I think that any of us who hold, or hope in the future to hold, tenured faculty positions, should be concerned about the growing percentage of courses being taught by these well-educated, and scandalously poorly-paid, 'adjunct' teachers. If the trend continues, we may all be without long-term contracts and benefits one day. Best wishes to all, M. DoranMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue