Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen
linguistlist.org>
I'm a Swiss PhD student in historical linguistics (University of Berne), currently engaging in a rather unusual field of research: I would like to write on the PERCEPTION / REPRESENTATION OF ARCHAIC LANGUAGE in literary texts (prose but primarily drama), movies and live enactments in historic thme parks; my primary sources are Walter Scott, Nathaniel Hawthorne, Mary E. Wilkins and Arthur Miller and I want to compare these authors' ways of 're-createing' 17th-century Puritan speech: what features have been chosen by those authors to represent the language of the past to their contemporary readership and what are the (synchronic) factors which influence a certain perception/representation of a language of the past (in my case early American English). While literary texts provide useful insights into the grammatical, lexical and orthographic aspect of an artificial Period Language, audio-visual instruments (e.g. film) can make use of phonological-phonetic characterizations of a language of the past. What choices do Hollywood producers/directors make when having their characters speak through actors: do they simply talk like people from the 20th century? Here I will rely on productions of The Scarlet Letter and The Crucible. Lastly I'd like to go to New England and record/talk to first-person actors in historic villages (PL,imouth Plantation, Salem Village) which specific choices induced the responsible people to head for a certain direction rather than another (what accents did they choose, what archaic vocabulary, what grammatical structures etc.) Do you know of any works that have been done in the field of HISTORICAL PERCEPTUAL LINGUISTICS or in the field of LINGUISTIC IDEOLOGY/AWARENESS, theoretical/universal or upon any language? Obviously my special interest is in the perception of and attitude towards early American English (1620-1700) not as contemporaries viewed it at the time but as people living in later centuries did!! There must be MYTHS around as to how the first 'Americans' spoke (e.g. Elizabethan English, like Shakespeare, they had no unified grammar, they always addressed each other with THOU, verbs had no inflections, their language corresponds to present-day substandards and dialects, it is today's folk-speech etc). By studying literary authors, directors of movies and historic sites etc. one may get an insight into the stereotypes that 'folks' in general are subject to. On the other hand, these people have the power to shape our ling. awareness of how our ancestors might have spoken. I myself found a very interesting book by Graham Tulloch about Sir Walter Scott's PERIOD LANGUAGE, i.e. the pseudo-early modern English he created for his novels set in the 15th/16th century. I have also found some very helpful bibliographical hints in the Cambridge History of the English language (Marckwardt, Mitford Mathews, Krapp, etc.). Still I feel there should be more around about this specific field of FOLK AWARENESS/PERCEPTION. I thank you for any help you can give me, like giving me the names of scholars working in this field or, more importantly, books/articles published so far. Yours sincerely, Adrian Pable University of Berne, SwitzerlandMail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue
I'm looking for information about an unpublished (?) article by William Labov in which he analyzes the accuracy of literary representations of AAVE in works such as "Huckleberry Finn" and "The Color Purple." Has anyone heard of this article (or similar articles) or know if it has been published somewhere? Thanks, Cece Cutler New York University 719 Broadway, 5th fl. New York, NY 10003 cqc9928Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issuenyu.edu