LINGUIST List 13.1056

Tue Apr 16 2002

Qs: Deletion & Epenthesis, Semantic Fields

Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karenlinguistlist.org>


We'd like to remind readers that the responses to queries are usually best posted to the individual asking the question. That individual is then strongly encouraged to post a summary to the list. This policy was instituted to help control the huge volume of mail on LINGUIST; so we would appreciate your cooperating with it whenever it seems appropriate. In addition to posting a summary, we'd like to remind people that it is usually a good idea to personally thank those individuals who have taken the trouble to respond to the query.

Directory

  1. Elliott Moreton, Chain shifts with deletion or epenthesis
  2. Andreas Nordin, semantic fields: recent publications?

Message 1: Chain shifts with deletion or epenthesis

Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 11:42:01 -0400 (EDT)
From: Elliott Moreton <moretonvonneumann.cog.jhu.edu>
Subject: Chain shifts with deletion or epenthesis

Dear Linguists:

 We are searching for examples of synchronic or diachronic chain
shifts (i.e., counterfeeding rule interactions, such that /A/->[B] while
/B/->[C]) in which segments are inserted or deleted.

 For example, in Catalan, there is a process which deletes a
word-final post-nasal stop, and another which deletes a word-final nasal;
however, word-final nasals created by stop deletion are not themselves
deleted: /bint/->[bin] 'twenty', /bin/->[bi] 'wine'.

 In the Catalan example, /A/->[B] and /B/->[C] are both deletions, but
we would also be interested in hearing of cases in which both were
insertions (hypothetical /q/->[qa], /qa/->[qat]), or one was an insertion
and the other a change (hypothetical /q/->[qi], /qi/->[ki]), etc.

 The most interesting case for us would be one which involved both a
deletion and an insertion: /AxB/->[AB], /AB/->[AyB]. We know of only one
claimed such case (Donegan & Stampe in Dinnsen (ed.) 1979).

 We also count "sole-survivor effects", i.e., cases in which *all*
instances of surface [B] are derived from underlying /A/. In Optimality
Theory, these must be analyzed as chain shifts: /A/->[B], /B/->[something
else]. A language in which, e.g., all surface clusters were derived by
syncope would therefore be of interest to us.

 A summary of all responses will be posted to the list (we can be
relied upon to do this; see LINGUIST 13.450, 2002 Feb. 14).

Many thanks,
Elliott Moreton and Paul Smolensky
Department of Cognitive Science
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A.
Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue

Message 2: semantic fields: recent publications?

Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 14:27:33 +0200
From: Andreas Nordin <andreas.nordineng.gu.se>
Subject: semantic fields: recent publications?

Dear all,

I wonder if there are any recent (or older) publications dealing with 
semantic fields both in general and specifically. I would be most 
grateful for any information.

Best regards,
Andreas Nordin

English Department
G�teborg University
Box 200
SE-405 30 G�teborg
SWEDEN
E-mail: andreas.nordineng.gu.se



 
Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue