Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen
linguistlist.org>
This is a query related to the subjects of the study. I did research* about twenty years ago on learners with near-native proficiency. The purpose was to examine the source of residual errors in the oral production of the subjects. The findings indicated that the very large majority of those errors were L1-related. This was supported by similar findings in Marton (1980) and Mukattash (1986). My question to A Zapata is then did he address this issue in his dissertation? If so, did he find any difference in resistance to defossilization between L1 -related errors and others. I would hypothesize that as the former constitute the vast majority of residual errors, they will be the most resistant. *Sheen, R.(1980). "The importance of negative transfer in the speech of near-bilinguals". International Review of Applied Linguistics Vol 18/2:105-119.Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue