Editor for this issue: Karolina Owczarzak <karolina
linguistlist.org>
New Dissertation Abstract Institution: Paris Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales Program: PhD Dissertation Status: Completed Degree Date: 1992 Author: Francois Nemo Dissertation Title: Contraintes de pertinence et competence enonciative. L'image du possible dans l'interlocution. Linguistic Field: Pragmatics Dissertation Director 1: Oswald Ducrot Dissertation Director 2: Francois Recanati Dissertation Director 3: Alain Berrendonner Dissertation Director 4: Pierre Encreve Dissertation Abstract: The idea that saying would be ruled by general pragmatic principles is not giving any clue when the diversity of utterance-types is to be accounted for. But in order to study this diversity, and for instance that we can say things which are not informative at all (but are argumentative or directive) but are still relevant, we need to ask the same question, i.e. the question of their relevance to all types of utterances, and compare the answers. It is shown here that beyond this diversity, what makes an utterance different from a proposition is that it associates a proposition with a modal frame. In other words, that utterances are saying something simultanesously about what is the case and what is not the case. It is shown then that the different types of utterances are building different modal frames, i.e images of what is possible, and specific descriptions are made to describe the conditions of relevance of argumentative utterances, performative (directive) utterances, in formative utterances, etc..Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue