Editor for this issue: Karen Milligan <karen
linguistlist.org>
Reference to Ronald Sheen's Posting (Linguist 13.1729) Research methodology in corpus linguistics is generally built on establishing comparative frameworks between texts. Hinkel (2002) has constructed a two-level framework. The first level looks at corpus linguistics research performed on "expert" or "reference" corpora to derive items of interest in the literature, while the second reports on native students' writing versus non-native writers regarding the use of those derived items. For teaching purposes, it is also believed that the statistical processing of texts places those texts further away from an immediate teaching context. Research of the sort enhances teaching indirectly, at the expense of providing immediate instances for teaching purposes. Tribble (2001) states that in writing four areas are important, "knowledge of content, writing processes, context, and language system" (Abstract). Most developmental writing texts, even those specifically written for an ESL audience, deal with two areas, content and writing processes (e.g. Academic Writing [Leki 1998], Patterns for College Writing [Kirshner and Mandell 2001], and Patterns for a Purpose[Clouse 1999]). They assume that the language system has already been taken care of, or will be taken care of as students develop their content knowledge, and as they refine their text through multiple revisions. Hinkel's text comes right in place to give evidence, to teachers, of language areas where students need help. In reference to language varieties dealt with, Hinkel (2002) definitely limits her research to a handful of Asian non-English speakers, including the Middle East. I believe that her data represent her non-native student population majorities. On the same note, Granger (1998) includes research that deals with acquisition of English by natives of European and non-European languages, such as French, Finnish, Spanish and Swedish, as well as others. Unlike traditional linguistic research built on well-defined hypotheses, corpus linguistics deals with observations, and text descriptions. Note: I am sorry for the delay in my response. References: Granger, S. (1998) Learner English on Computer, Longman London and New York: Addison Wesley Tribble, C. (2001) "Small corpora and teaching writing: a corpus-informed pedagogy of writing" in Mohsen Ghadessy, Alex Henry and Robert L.Roseburry (Eds.) Small Corpus Studies and ELT: Theory and Practice, Amesterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp382-406Mail to author|Respond to list|Read more issues|LINGUIST home page|Top of issue